VoIP Mailing List Archives

[birgit at westhawk.co.uk]

Hi,

Is stun.freeswitch.org down?
Our FreeSWITCH installation broke overnight (no configuration changes
made) because stun can no longer be reached.

# telnet stun.freeswitch.org 3478
Trying 216.27.14.70...
telnet: connect to address 216.27.14.70: No route to host

# traceroute stun.freeswitch.org
ends with ..
18 * dr1-g2-2.cry.hostedsolutions.com (216.27.30.86) 76.936 ms 77.497 ms
19 freeswitch01.bandwidth.com (216.27.14.70) 81.201 ms !X 81.730 ms
!X 81.900 ms !X

Cheers, Birgit

--
-- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit@westhawk.co.uk,
-- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
-- Company no: 1769350
-- Registered Office:
-- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
-- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
-- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>

_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[brian at freeswitch.org]

Nope its not down at all. Works perfectly fine here.

/b

On Nov 4, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Birgit Arkesteijn wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

They are the same IP.

/b

On Nov 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Birgit Arkesteijn wrote:

[birgit at westhawk.co.uk]

Hi Brian,

Thanks for your feedback.
From your point of view, is "stun.freeswitch.org" inside your network?

Anyone else experiencing problems?
It's odd that I can reach "freeswitch01.bandwidth.com", but not
"stun.freeswitch.org"

This is not my area of expertise, but could it be a hosting or
networking problem?

Hop 12 goes via Washington
12 * * iar2-loopback.Washington.savvis.net (206.24.226.13) 77.502 ms

Maybe it's an "election day" problem.

Cheers, Birgit


On 04/11/08 13:13, Brian West wrote:

[birgit at westhawk.co.uk]

Hi Brian,

Thanks again for your reply.

Looking at our firewall rules (STUN_FREESWITCH="208.64.203.130"), for
some reason the IP address has changed from 208.64.203.130 to 216.27.14.70.
Does that ring a bell?

I'll ask the person(s) in charge to change the rules.

Cheers, Birgit


On 04/11/08 13:32, Brian West wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

Yes the IP did change but you shouldn't be relying on our STUN server
for production. I can take out your network with one issuance of
pkill -9 stund

You're better off running your own stun server if you depend on it for
production.

/b

On Nov 4, 2008, at 8:02 AM, Birgit Arkesteijn wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

I have two ip's bound on the same machine and start the stun server to
use both.

/b

On Nov 4, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Birgit Arkesteijn wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

This is what we run on stun.freeswitch.org http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun/

I highly recommend checking it out

/b

On Nov 4, 2008, at 8:02 AM, Birgit Arkesteijn wrote:

[birgit at westhawk.co.uk]

Hi Brian,

Thanks for your help again.

Yes, running our own seems like a good idea.
This is my development environment, so I hadn't bothered.

Thanks for the recommendation. I'd already found that link.
It's the Vovida.org STUN server, isn't it?
The documentation,
http://www.voipinfo.org/wiki/view/Vovida.org+STUN+server, says:

3. You must have two IPs bound to the machine that you want to setup the
STUN server on or, use two different machines. Preferrably, you would
setup the STUN server to have the IPs on the local machine through
ifconfig.

I'd have to check with the more 'network savvy' if we have that available.

Thanks, Birgit


On 04/11/08 14:14, Brian West wrote: