VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
gianluca.merlo at gmai... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:55 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Running configure from subdirectory of sour |
|
|
Hello everyone,
I would like to seek your advice regarding a build (or rather "configure") problem I am running into. For reference, tests are all relative to a build from a 1.8.26.0 tarball, on Debian Wheezy.
I would like to understand if it is possible, and if any of you have tried, to build Asterisk from a subdirectory of the source tree, i.e., from a clean source tree
# mkdir my-build-directory
# cd my-build-directory
# ../configure
# make
I lack a proper amount of knowledge on the matter, but I think that this should be "legit" with a common autotools build toolchain. Tests suggest that (at least in my case) this is not working with
Quote: | configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in `pwd` ".."/`pwd`
|
Looking in the configure process in detail, the failure seem to follow the checks (/bin/sh -x output)
Quote: | + for ac_dir in '`pwd`' '"$srcdir"/`pwd`'
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install-sh
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install.sh
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/shtool
+ for ac_dir in '`pwd`' '"$srcdir"/`pwd`'
+ test -f ..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install-sh
+ test -f ..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install.sh
+ test -f ..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/shtool |
It looks to me that despite checking "`pwd`" leads to a correct behaviour, checking "../`pwd`" is not correct. I seem to understand that this behaviour was introduced in configure.ac at r259848, by adding
Quote: | AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(`pwd`)
|
The log for the commit reports
Quote: | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
r259848 | qwell | 2010-04-28 22:32:14 +0200 (Wed, 28 Apr 2010) | 9 lines
Merged revisions 259847 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r259847 | qwell | 2010-04-28 15:30:21 -0500 (Wed, 28 Apr 2010) | 1 line
Add AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR to configure script, so systems without install can use install-sh from our source dir.
........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Isn't the default behaviour for autoconf enough (http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Optional.html)? Can this be considered as a bug in Asterisk's the build system, preventing an otherwise working build scenario (i.e. configuring and building in a subdirectory of the source tree)?
Thank you in advance for your help
Gianluca |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jason.parker at schmoo... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:08 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Running configure from subdirectory of sour |
|
|
That's not something that is likely to be supported. Any configure
script in the tree will be run via the top-level build process, as
needed. Is there some reason you think you need to run the other
configure scripts yourself?
On 03/05/2014 08:54 AM, Gianluca Merlo wrote:
Quote: | Hello everyone,
I would like to seek your advice regarding a build (or rather
"configure") problem I am running into. For reference, tests are all
relative to a build from a 1.8.26.0 tarball, on Debian Wheezy.
I would like to understand if it is possible, and if any of you have
tried, to build Asterisk from a subdirectory of the source tree, i.e.,
from a clean source tree
# mkdir my-build-directory
# cd my-build-directory
# ../configure
# make
I lack a proper amount of knowledge on the matter, but I think that this
should be "legit" with a common autotools build toolchain. Tests suggest
that (at least in my case) this is not working with
configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in
`pwd` ".."/`pwd`
Looking in the configure process in detail, the failure seem to follow
the checks (/bin/sh -x output)
+ for ac_dir in '`pwd`' '"$srcdir"/`pwd`'
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install-sh
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install.sh
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/shtool
+ for ac_dir in '`pwd`' '"$srcdir"/`pwd`'
+ test -f
..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install-sh
+ test -f
..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install.sh
+ test -f ..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/shtool
It looks to me that despite checking "`pwd`" leads to a correct
behaviour, checking "../`pwd`" is not correct. I seem to understand that
this behaviour was introduced in configure.ac <http://configure.ac> at
r259848, by adding
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(`pwd`)
The log for the commit reports
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r259848 | qwell | 2010-04-28 22:32:14 +0200 (Wed, 28 Apr 2010) | 9 lines
Merged revisions 259847 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r259847 | qwell | 2010-04-28 15:30:21 -0500 (Wed, 28 Apr 2010) | 1
line
Add AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR to configure script, so systems without
install can use install-sh from our source dir.
........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't the default behaviour for autoconf enough
(http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Optional.html)?
Can this be considered as a bug in Asterisk's the build system,
preventing an otherwise working build scenario (i.e. configuring and
building in a subdirectory of the source tree)?
Thank you in advance for your help
Gianluca
|
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gianluca.merlo at gmai... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:24 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Running configure from subdirectory of sour |
|
|
2014-03-05 20:08 GMT+01:00 Jason Parker <jason.parker@schmoozecom.com (jason.parker@schmoozecom.com)>:
Quote: | That's not something that is likely to be supported. Any configure
script in the tree will be run via the top-level build process, as
needed. |
Hello Jason,
I admit I naively have yet to consider whether the actual build could work or not, and assumed (for lack of knowledge) it could. By chance, is yours an assumption or you have personally experienced (or know by understanding its inner workings) that the top level make does not perform correctly if the sources lie elsewhere (in this case, in the parent directory)?
Quote: | Is there some reason you think you need to run the other
configure scripts yourself?
|
If your question is related to the origin of the need of configuring and building in a subdirectory, I am in need of building custom Debian packages for Asterisk, and my plan was to use a single source package to build several "monolithic" Asterisk binary packages, each with different configure options and patches to modify/add some functionalities (I currently compile and install them manually, and could use some Debian-magic-automation).
Debhelper offers a "--builddirectory" option which allows to easily perform such task, and I already successfully used it on more simple software using the autotool build toolchain, but essentially this works as in my "manual" example, thus failing.
Thanks in advance for your advice.
Quote: | On 03/05/2014 08:54 AM, Gianluca Merlo wrote:
Quote: | Hello everyone,
I would like to seek your advice regarding a build (or rather
"configure") problem I am running into. For reference, tests are all
relative to a build from a 1.8.26.0 tarball, on Debian Wheezy.
I would like to understand if it is possible, and if any of you have
tried, to build Asterisk from a subdirectory of the source tree, i.e.,
from a clean source tree
# mkdir my-build-directory
# cd my-build-directory
# ../configure
# make
I lack a proper amount of knowledge on the matter, but I think that this
should be "legit" with a common autotools build toolchain. Tests suggest
that (at least in my case) this is not working with
configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in
`pwd` ".."/`pwd`
Looking in the configure process in detail, the failure seem to follow
the checks (/bin/sh -x output)
+ for ac_dir in '`pwd`' '"$srcdir"/`pwd`'
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install-sh
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install.sh
+ test -f /home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/shtool
+ for ac_dir in '`pwd`' '"$srcdir"/`pwd`'
+ test -f
..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install-sh
+ test -f
..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/install.sh
+ test -f ..//home/gian/src/asterisk-1.8.26.0/my-build-directory/shtool
It looks to me that despite checking "`pwd`" leads to a correct
behaviour, checking "../`pwd`" is not correct. I seem to understand that
|
Quote: | this behaviour was introduced in configure.ac <http://configure.ac> at
r259848, by adding
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(`pwd`)
The log for the commit reports
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r259848 | qwell | 2010-04-28 22:32:14 +0200 (Wed, 28 Apr 2010) | 9 lines
Merged revisions 259847 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r259847 | qwell | 2010-04-28 15:30:21 -0500 (Wed, 28 Apr 2010) | 1
line
Add AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR to configure script, so systems without
install can use install-sh from our source dir.
........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't the default behaviour for autoconf enough
(http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Optional.html)?
Can this be considered as a bug in Asterisk's the build system,
preventing an otherwise working build scenario (i.e. configuring and
building in a subdirectory of the source tree)?
Thank you in advance for your help
Gianluca
|
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|