VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ish at pack-net.co.uk Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 7:17 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Channel names |
|
|
Hi
I'm using asterisk 1.8.
How are channel names constructed. I always thought they were
<technology>/<peer>-<hex counter>
but I've had a lot of instances where a channel name doesn't have the correct peer as part of it.
Is it unwise to use channel names to extract the peers involved in a call?
--
Quote: | Ishfaq Malik
Department: VOIP Support
Company: Packnet Limited
t: +44 (0)845 004 4994
f: +44 (0)161 660 9825
e: ish@pack-net.co.uk (ish@pack-net.co.uk)
w: http://www.pack-net.co.uk
Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, Duplex 2, Ducie House
37 Ducie Street
Manchester, M1 2JW
COMPANY REG NO. 04920552
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjordan at digium.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 9:19 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Channel names |
|
|
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Ishfaq Malik <ish@pack-net.co.uk (ish@pack-net.co.uk)> wrote:
Quote: | Hi
I'm using asterisk 1.8.
How are channel names constructed. I always thought they were
<technology>/<peer>-<hex counter>
but I've had a lot of instances where a channel name doesn't have the correct peer as part of it.
Is it unwise to use channel names to extract the peers involved in a call?
|
How a channel is named is a function of the channel technology. Which channel technology(ies) are you curious about?
Matt
--
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ish at pack-net.co.uk Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 9:22 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Channel names |
|
|
On 1 May 2014 15:19, Matthew Jordan <mjordan@digium.com (mjordan@digium.com)> wrote:
Quote: |
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Ishfaq Malik <ish@pack-net.co.uk (ish@pack-net.co.uk)> wrote:
Quote: | Hi
I'm using asterisk 1.8.
How are channel names constructed. I always thought they were
<technology>/<peer>-<hex counter>
but I've had a lot of instances where a channel name doesn't have the correct peer as part of it.
Is it unwise to use channel names to extract the peers involved in a call?
|
How a channel is named is a function of the channel technology. Which channel technology(ies) are you curious about?
Matt
|
SIP only
Ish
--
Quote: | Ishfaq Malik
Department: VOIP Support
Company: Packnet Limited
t: +44 (0)845 004 4994
f: +44 (0)161 660 9825
e: ish@pack-net.co.uk (ish@pack-net.co.uk)
w: http://www.pack-net.co.uk
Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, Duplex 2, Ducie House
37 Ducie Street
Manchester, M1 2JW
COMPANY REG NO. 04920552
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|