VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jkillen at allamerican... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:24 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy |
|
|
I have two servers, each connected to the PTSN via PRI. When I call from site A (951-999-9999) to site B (555-1212) and the phone at site B is on the phone, I hear the normal ring tone for about 20 seconds, then the message "all circuits are busy now. please try your call again latter" followed by the congestion tone. Instead, I want this to busy ring and then hang up without any message.
Here is a snippet from site A:
…
[2014-07-09 09:56:16] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- Called DAHDI/g5/5551212
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is proceeding passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is ringing
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is making progress passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:18] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- SIP/260-0000a2f1 requested media update control 26, passing it to DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[2286][C-0000dab7] sig_pri.c: -- Span 7: Channel 0/3 got hangup request, cause 16
…
And from site B:
...
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-exten-vm:22] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?s-BUSY,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-exten-vm,s-BUSY,1)
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?exit,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:2] PlayTones("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "busy") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:3] Busy("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "20") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm, s-BUSY, 3) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f' in macro 'exten-vm'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, 803, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@from-did-direct:1] Macro("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "") in new stack
...
My hunch is that the PRI cause is never set, so site A gets the generic cause 16 (normal call clearing) instead of 17 (user busy). I suspect this is causing site A to get the "all circuits are busy now" message instead of a busy signal. I thought calling Busy() would cause the PRI cause to get set when used on a channel that is PRI? Should this be manually set instead?
Site B details:
Asterisk version 11.10.2
Libpri version: 1.4.12
DAHDI version: 2.9.0.1
Freepbx version: 2.11.0.37, distro version 5.211.65-14
-Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EWieling at nyigc.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:34 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy |
|
|
If you use Playtones you should put an Answer and a Wait(1) before the Playtones
I recommend using the Hangup app instead. Busy would be Hangup(17).
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy
I have two servers, each connected to the PTSN via PRI. When I call from site A (951-999-9999) to site B (555-1212) and the phone at site B is on the phone, I hear the normal ring tone for about 20 seconds, then the message "all circuits are busy now. please try your call again latter" followed by the congestion tone. Instead, I want this to busy ring and then hang up without any message.
Here is a snippet from site A:
…
[2014-07-09 09:56:16] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- Called DAHDI/g5/5551212
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is proceeding passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is ringing
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is making progress passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:18] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- SIP/260-0000a2f1 requested media update control 26, passing it to DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[2286][C-0000dab7] sig_pri.c: -- Span 7: Channel 0/3 got hangup request, cause 16
…
And from site B:
...
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-exten-vm:22] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?s-BUSY,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-exten-vm,s-BUSY,1)
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?exit,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:2] PlayTones("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "busy") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:3] Busy("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "20") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm, s-BUSY, 3) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f' in macro 'exten-vm'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, 803, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@from-did-direct:1] Macro("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "") in new stack
...
My hunch is that the PRI cause is never set, so site A gets the generic cause 16 (normal call clearing) instead of 17 (user busy). I suspect this is causing site A to get the "all circuits are busy now" message instead of a busy signal. I thought calling Busy() would cause the PRI cause to get set when used on a channel that is PRI? Should this be manually set instead?
Site B details:
Asterisk version 11.10.2
Libpri version: 1.4.12
DAHDI version: 2.9.0.1
Freepbx version: 2.11.0.37, distro version 5.211.65-14
-Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jkillen at allamerican... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:00 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy |
|
|
I tried changing the dialplan to use Hangup(17) instead of Playback/Busy. Now instead of ringing for 20 seconds and then getting the “all circuits are busy now”, I get “all circuits are busy now” immediately.
New snippet from site A:
…
[2014-07-09 10:53:43] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- Called DAHDI/g5/5551212
[2014-07-09 10:53:43] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b is proceeding passing it to SIP/260-0000a35c
[2014-07-09 10:53:44] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b is ringing
[2014-07-09 10:53:44] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b is making progress passing it to SIP/260-0000a35c
[2014-07-09 10:53:51] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b answered SIP/260-0000a35c
[2014-07-09 10:53:58] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] res_musiconhold.c: -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b
[2014-07-09 10:55:06] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] res_musiconhold.c: -- Stopped music on hold on DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@macro-dialout-trunk:1] Macro("SIP/260-0000a35c", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("SIP/260-0000a35c", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("SIP/260-0000a35c", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("SIP/260-0000a35c", "") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c' in macro 'hangupcall'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (macro-dialout-trunk, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] chan_dahdi.c: -- Hungup 'DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-dialout-trunk, s, 22) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c' in macro 'dialout-trunk'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-internal, 5551212, 5) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c'
…
New snippet from site B:
…
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-exten-vm,s-BUSY,1)
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "0?exit,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:2] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "17") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm, s-BUSY, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603' in macro 'exten-vm'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, 803, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@from-did-direct:1] Macro("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603' in macro 'hangupcall'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] chan_dahdi.c: -- Hungup 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603'
...
It seems that now the PRI cause isn’t getting set at all.
-Justin
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy
If you use Playtones you should put an Answer and a Wait(1) before the Playtones
I recommend using the Hangup app instead. Busy would be Hangup(17).
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy
I have two servers, each connected to the PTSN via PRI. When I call from site A (951-999-9999) to site B (555-1212) and the phone at site B is on the phone, I hear the normal ring tone for about 20 seconds, then the message "all circuits are busy now. please try your call again latter" followed by the congestion tone. Instead, I want this to busy ring and then hang up without any message.
Here is a snippet from site A:
…
[2014-07-09 09:56:16] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- Called DAHDI/g5/5551212
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is proceeding passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is ringing
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is making progress passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:18] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- SIP/260-0000a2f1 requested media update control 26, passing it to DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[2286][C-0000dab7] sig_pri.c: -- Span 7: Channel 0/3 got hangup request, cause 16
…
And from site B:
...
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-exten-vm:22] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?s-BUSY,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-exten-vm,s-BUSY,1)
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?exit,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:2] PlayTones("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "busy") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:3] Busy("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "20") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm, s-BUSY, 3) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f' in macro 'exten-vm'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, 803, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@from-did-direct:1] Macro("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "") in new stack
...
My hunch is that the PRI cause is never set, so site A gets the generic cause 16 (normal call clearing) instead of 17 (user busy). I suspect this is causing site A to get the "all circuits are busy now" message instead of a busy signal. I thought calling Busy() would cause the PRI cause to get set when used on a channel that is PRI? Should this be manually set instead?
Site B details:
Asterisk version 11.10.2
Libpri version: 1.4.12
DAHDI version: 2.9.0.1
Freepbx version: 2.11.0.37, distro version 5.211.65-14
-Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jkillen at allamerican... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:11 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy |
|
|
I figured it out – the busy tone was being generated by the local end. It seems that upon receiving a hangup, freepbx tries the next trunk. In this case there isn’t any other trunk, so I get “all circuits are busy now”.
For anyone interested, the site B playback()/busy() condition has been submitted as bug# 7706 - http://issues.freepbx.org/browse/FREEPBX-7706
The site A truck failover retry on hangupcause’s that shouldn’t be retried has been submitted as bug# 7705 - http://issues.freepbx.org/browse/FREEPBX-7705
-Justin
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 11:00 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy
I tried changing the dialplan to use Hangup(17) instead of Playback/Busy. Now instead of ringing for 20 seconds and then getting the “all circuits are busy now”, I get “all circuits are busy now” immediately.
New snippet from site A:
…
[2014-07-09 10:53:43] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- Called DAHDI/g5/5551212
[2014-07-09 10:53:43] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b is proceeding passing it to SIP/260-0000a35c
[2014-07-09 10:53:44] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b is ringing
[2014-07-09 10:53:44] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b is making progress passing it to SIP/260-0000a35c
[2014-07-09 10:53:51] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b answered SIP/260-0000a35c
[2014-07-09 10:53:58] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] res_musiconhold.c: -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b
[2014-07-09 10:55:06] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] res_musiconhold.c: -- Stopped music on hold on DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@macro-dialout-trunk:1] Macro("SIP/260-0000a35c", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("SIP/260-0000a35c", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("SIP/260-0000a35c", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("SIP/260-0000a35c", "") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c' in macro 'hangupcall'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (macro-dialout-trunk, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] chan_dahdi.c: -- Hungup 'DAHDI/i7/5551212-413b'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-dialout-trunk, s, 22) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c' in macro 'dialout-trunk'
[2014-07-09 10:55:07] VERBOSE[23020][C-0000db0d] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-internal, 5551212, 5) exited non-zero on 'SIP/260-0000a35c'
…
New snippet from site B:
…
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-exten-vm,s-BUSY,1)
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "0?exit,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:2] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "17") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm, s-BUSY, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603' in macro 'exten-vm'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, 803, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@from-did-direct:1] Macro("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603", "") in new stack
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603' in macro 'hangupcall'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603'
[2014-07-09 10:47:03] VERBOSE[7133][C-00000c69] chan_dahdi.c: -- Hungup 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-603'
...
It seems that now the PRI cause isn’t getting set at all.
-Justin
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy
If you use Playtones you should put an Answer and a Wait(1) before the Playtones
I recommend using the Hangup app instead. Busy would be Hangup(17).
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy
I have two servers, each connected to the PTSN via PRI. When I call from site A (951-999-9999) to site B (555-1212) and the phone at site B is on the phone, I hear the normal ring tone for about 20 seconds, then the message "all circuits are busy now. please try your call again latter" followed by the congestion tone. Instead, I want this to busy ring and then hang up without any message.
Here is a snippet from site A:
…
[2014-07-09 09:56:16] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- Called DAHDI/g5/5551212
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is proceeding passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is ringing
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b is making progress passing it to SIP/260-0000a2f1
[2014-07-09 09:56:18] VERBOSE[21606][C-0000dab7] app_dial.c: -- SIP/260-0000a2f1 requested media update control 26, passing it to DAHDI/i7/5551212-411b
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[2286][C-0000dab7] sig_pri.c: -- Span 7: Channel 0/3 got hangup request, cause 16
…
And from site B:
...
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-exten-vm:22] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?s-BUSY,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-exten-vm,s-BUSY,1)
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?exit,1") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:2] PlayTones("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "busy") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:17] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s-BUSY@macro-exten-vm:3] Busy("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "20") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] app_macro.c: == Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm, s-BUSY, 3) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f' in macro 'exten-vm'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: == Spawn extension (from-did-direct, 803, 2) exited non-zero on 'DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f'
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [h@from-did-direct:1] Macro("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "hangupcall,") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "1?theend") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
[2014-07-09 09:56:37] VERBOSE[3775][C-00000bb1] pbx.c: -- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("DAHDI/i8/9519999999-59f", "") in new stack
...
My hunch is that the PRI cause is never set, so site A gets the generic cause 16 (normal call clearing) instead of 17 (user busy). I suspect this is causing site A to get the "all circuits are busy now" message instead of a busy signal. I thought calling Busy() would cause the PRI cause to get set when used on a channel that is PRI? Should this be manually set instead?
Site B details:
Asterisk version 11.10.2
Libpri version: 1.4.12
DAHDI version: 2.9.0.1
Freepbx version: 2.11.0.37, distro version 5.211.65-14
-Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|