VoIP Mailing List Archives

[amessina at messinet.com]

Using asterisk 1.4.18 and zaptel 1.4.9 on x86_64, I am having trouble dialing
out to the pstn. The call is initiated at Zap/1-1 and should exit via Zap/3.
I get the following:

-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1'
-- Executing [2111 at internal:1] Dial("Zap/1-1", "Zap/3/8801234") in new stack
[Feb 25 02:36:59] DEBUG[7194]: chan_zap.c:1954 zt_call: Dialing '8801234'
[Feb 25 02:36:59] DEBUG[7194]: chan_zap.c:2030 zt_call: Deferring dialing...
-- Called 3/8801234
[Feb 25 02:37:00] WARNING[7194]: chan_zap.c:3835 zt_handle_event: Detected
alarm on channel 3: No Alarm
-- Hungup 'Zap/3-1'
== Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
[Feb 25 02:37:00] NOTICE[7082]: chan_zap.c:6678 handle_init_event: Alarm
cleared on channel 3

So the call fails and if I weren't using a test extension:
exten => 2111,1,Dial(Zap/3/8801234)

it would proceed in the dialplan.

asterisk]# cat /proc/zaptel/1
Span 1: WCTDM/0 "Wildcard TDM400P REV I Board 1" (MASTER)

1 WCTDM/0/0 FXOKS (In use)
2 WCTDM/0/1
3 WCTDM/0/2 FXSKS (In use)
4 WCTDM/0/3
Where do I go with this?

--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080225/3b048c10/attachment.pgp

[seandarcy2 at gmail.com]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:42 AM, Anthony Messina <amessina at messinet.com> wrote:

[covici at ccs.covici.com]

Hi. Since I am stuck with kernel 2.6.24, is there any way to compile
zaptel 1.4.7.1 under kernel 2.6.24? I tried using
make KBUILD_NOPEDANTIC=1 -- however this does not compile. Any other
suggestions for this and can I still use the latest version of
asterisk if I do this successfully?

Thanks.

on Monday 02/25/2008 sean darcy(seandarcy2 at gmail.com) wrote

[covici at ccs.covici.com]

I am getting this strange error:

make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.7.1'
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.24-gentoo-r2/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.7.1 HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24-gentoo-r2'
CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.7.1/wcfxo.o
/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.7.1/wcfxo.c:38:27: error: zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory

But the file is there.
At least its in the source directory.
I did the ./configure and the make menuselect to eliminate some
unnecessary modules.
on Tuesday 02/26/2008 Tzafrir Cohen(tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com) wrote

[tzafrir.cohen at xorco...]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:45:15AM -0500, John covici wrote:

[covici at ccs.covici.com]

I do have the newer one installed -- is this the problem?
And why this weird error anyway?

on Tuesday 02/26/2008 Tzafrir Cohen(tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com) wrote

[tzafrir.cohen at xorco...]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:50:09AM -0500, John covici wrote:

[covici at ccs.covici.com]

OK, here is the problem -- how do I compile 1.4.7.1 using kernel
2.6.24 -- when I try the make KBUILD_NOPEDANTIC=1 I get the no such
file or directory that I already mentioned -- when I take out that
KBUILD option, I get what I got before -- the error from the kernel
module build about the CFLAGS being changed in the Makefile. So how
can I compile this thing till there is a fix for the bug or the
regression is removed?
on Tuesday 02/26/2008 Tzafrir Cohen(tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com) wrote

[tzafrir.cohen at xorco...]

Slightly edited your message:

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:48:13AM -0500, John covici wrote:

[russell at digium.com]

Anthony Messina wrote:

[al.baker at pipeline.com]

Is this only on the "_64" zaptel or will affect ALL zpatel 1.4.9 ?

-----Original Message-----

[sruffell at digium.com]

Anthony Messina wrote:

[kpfleming at digium.com]

Anthony Messina wrote:

[kpfleming at digium.com]

Anthony Messina wrote:

[ra25 at wires.no-ip.org]

Have the some symptoms mentioned in http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12099
After upgrade to Zaptel 1.4.9.2 I can't dial out at all, with 1.4.8 there
were just random dial-out problems.

-- Executing [*903 at Martin:1] Answer("SIP/210-081e9968", "") in new stack
-- Executing [*903 at Martin:2] Dial("SIP/210-081e9968", "Zap/3") in new stack
-- Called 3
[2008-03-02 09:43:17] WARNING[5051]: chan_zap.c:4114 zt_handle_event:
Detected alarm on channel 3: No Alarm
-- Hungup 'Zap/3-1'
== Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)

-- Executing [*903 at Martin:3] Hangup("SIP/210-081e9968", "") in new stack
== Spawn extension (Martin, *903, 3) exited non-zero on 'SIP/210-081e9968'
-- Executing [*903 at Martin:1] Answer("SIP/210-081e9968", "") in new stack
-- Executing [*903 at Martin:2] Dial("SIP/210-081e9968", "Zap/3") in new stack
-- Called 3
[2008-03-02 09:44:17] WARNING[5055]: chan_zap.c:4114 zt_handle_event:
Detected alarm on channel 3: No Alarm
-- Hungup 'Zap/3-1'
== Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)

-- Executing [*903 at Martin:3] Hangup("SIP/210-081e9968", "") in new stack
== Spawn extension (Martin, *903, 3) exited non-zero on 'SIP/210-081e9968'

-- Executing [*904 at Martin:1] Answer("SIP/210-081e9968", "") in new stack
-- Executing [*904 at Martin:2] Dial("SIP/210-081e9968", "Zap/4") in new stack
-- Called 4

[2008-03-02 09:44:29] WARNING[5056]: chan_zap.c:4114 zt_handle_event:
Detected alarm on channel 4: No Alarm
-- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
== Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
-- Executing [*904 at Martin:3] Hangup("SIP/210-081e9968", "") in new stack
== Spawn extension (Martin, *904, 3) exited non-zero on 'SIP/210-081e9968'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1'
-- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'


----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming at digium.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: 29. ?nora 2008 08:59
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400P dialout problem