VoIP Mailing List Archives

[joelsolanki at gmail.com]

Hi marek,

Thanks for the update.
I have Sangoma A104D and wanted to use ss7 signalling. I came accross chan_ss7 but found sifira is not in active development. But is this chan_ss7 stable and can be used in production server implementation.
We are going to have 2 to 3 boxes with ss7 signalling using sangoma but I am looking for open source ss7 implementation which is chan_ss7. so need to know about stability and recommendation for using on production server.
Please provide your recommendation & suggestions.


Regards,
Joel
----- Original Message -----
From: "marek cervenka" <cervajs at fpf.slu.cz>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>; <asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] chan_ss7 0.10

[joelsolanki at gmail.com]

Hi marek,

Thanks for the update.
I have Sangoma A104D and wanted to use ss7 signalling. I came accross
chan_ss7 but found sifira is not in active development. But is this
chan_ss7 stable and can be used in production server implementation.
We are going to have 2 to 3 boxes with ss7 signalling using sangoma but I am
looking for open source ss7 implementation which is chan_ss7. so need to
know about stability and recommendation for using on production server.
Please provide your recommendation & suggestions.


Regards,
Joel
----- Original Message -----
From: "marek cervenka" <cervajs at fpf.slu.cz>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>; <asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] chan_ss7 0.10

[joelsolanki at gmail.com]

Hi marek,

Thanks for the update.
I have Sangoma A104D and wanted to use ss7 signalling. I came accross
chan_ss7 but found sifira is not in active development. But is this
chan_ss7 stable and can be used in production server implementation.
We are going to have 2 to 3 boxes with ss7 signalling using sangoma but I am

looking for open source ss7 implementation which is chan_ss7. so need to
know about stability and recommendation for using on production server.
Please provide your recommendation & suggestions.


Regards,
Joel
----- Original Message -----
From: "marek cervenka"
<cervajs at fpf.slu.cz<mhtml:{A3F0AE4F-7CF7-4CD6-865B-26EEF082BBB2}mid://00000002/!x-usc:mailto:cervajs at fpf.slu.cz>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com<mhtml:{A3F0AE4F-7CF7-4CD6-865B-26EEF082BBB2}mid://00000002/!x-usc:mailto:asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>>;
<asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com<mhtml:{A3F0AE4F-7CF7-4CD6-865B-26EEF082BBB2}mid://00000002/!x-usc:mailto:asterisk-ss7 at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] chan_ss7 0.10

[rob at hillis.dyndns.org]

Posting the same question three times at 12 hour intervals will not get
you a faster reply.

Especially not to an original email that was written in November of last
year.
Joel Solanki wrote:

[joelsolanki at gmail.com]

Hi,

I tried 3 times to send this message. It goes out but i dont recieve mail
sent on asterisk-users at lists.digium.com but when someone replies to that
email i recieve the email like you did.
I thought mails were not going to mailling list to tried 3 times. But it is
strange. As far as i know if i sent mail to
asterisk-users at list.digium.comthen even i should also recieve my email
right ?

may be i can be wrong. Any i am happy that message has reached the
asterisk-users Hope to recieve some feedback soon
Regards,
Joel

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Rob Hillis <rob at hillis.dyndns.org> wrote:

[andrew.furey at gmail.com]

On 27/02/2008, Joel Solanki <joelsolanki at gmail.com> wrote:

[cervajs at fpf.slu.cz]

[joelsolanki at gmail.com]

Hi marek,

gr8. I am working on chan_ss7 now..
Regards,
Joel

----- Original Message -----
From: "marek cervenka" <cervajs at fpf.slu.cz>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] chan_ss7 0.10