VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tony at softins.clara.... Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Clustering Meetme over multiple boxes? |
|
|
Has anyone here done any work on clustering Meetme conferences over
multiple Asterisk boxes? The scenario I am thinking of is where there are
two or more boxes connected to a set of PRIs that all answer to the same
PSTN number, and where it's not possible to know in advance on which box
a call would arrive. So it would be possible to have some calls on one
box and some on another, that should all be conferenced together, by
somehow linking matching Meetme conferences on both/all boxes.
Particular complications I can envisage are the handling of marked users
(A, w and x options), call recording (r option), and MeetmeAdmin
operations such as mute all and unmute all.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
astmattf at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:13 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Clustering Meetme over multiple boxes? |
|
|
Hello,
We have done this using IAX trunks between Asterisk servers to connect
a PRI line on server A with a meetme room on server B. We have had
hundreds of participants in meetme rooms across a dozen Asterisk
servers using this method.
Not knowing your setup I'm not sure if this would work easily for you,
but this is a somewhat-easy, scalable method for expanding meetme
capacity.
MATT---
On 3/4/08, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.clara.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: | Has anyone here done any work on clustering Meetme conferences over
multiple Asterisk boxes? The scenario I am thinking of is where there are
two or more boxes connected to a set of PRIs that all answer to the same
PSTN number, and where it's not possible to know in advance on which box
a call would arrive. So it would be possible to have some calls on one
box and some on another, that should all be conferenced together, by
somehow linking matching Meetme conferences on both/all boxes.
Particular complications I can envisage are the handling of marked users
(A, w and x options), call recording (r option), and MeetmeAdmin
operations such as mute all and unmute all.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tony at softins.clara.... Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Clustering Meetme over multiple boxes? |
|
|
Hi Matt, thanks for your reply.
In article <61575c810803040813m7830b4bbj3cbd8939d9975711 at mail.gmail.com>,
Matt Florell <astmattf at gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: | Hello,
We have done this using IAX trunks between Asterisk servers to connect
a PRI line on server A with a meetme room on server B. We have had
hundreds of participants in meetme rooms across a dozen Asterisk
servers using this method.
Not knowing your setup I'm not sure if this would work easily for you,
but this is a somewhat-easy, scalable method for expanding meetme
capacity.
|
Is it correct to understand that in your setup, a given conference only
ever exists on a single server (presumably the one used by the first
caller), and that calls arriving on a different server are proxied
individually to whichever server is hosting the requested conference?
I can see that this would be quite easy, and would work well for lots
of smallish conferences, but might be a bit heavy for a system running
a small number of huge conferences. In the latter case, I want to look
at having a local conference on each box and bridging the conferences
together. This is the bit that gets complicated for making conf-wide
decisions
Cheers
Tony
Quote: | MATT---
On 3/4/08, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.clara.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: | Has anyone here done any work on clustering Meetme conferences over
multiple Asterisk boxes? The scenario I am thinking of is where there are
two or more boxes connected to a set of PRIs that all answer to the same
PSTN number, and where it's not possible to know in advance on which box
a call would arrive. So it would be possible to have some calls on one
box and some on another, that should all be conferenced together, by
somehow linking matching Meetme conferences on both/all boxes.
Particular complications I can envisage are the handling of marked users
(A, w and x options), call recording (r option), and MeetmeAdmin
operations such as mute all and unmute all.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
| --
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
astmattf at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:52 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Clustering Meetme over multiple boxes? |
|
|
Hello,
I have actually done this both ways, with many small conferences and
few large conferences.
The best example of both is the "voice_lab" feature that is included
with VICIDIAL(although not very well documented). What this feature
does is it has students log into individual meetme rooms and then have
an instructor dial into their own meetme room. When the students are
all logged in and the instructor is ready the instructor clicks a
button to initiate calls from all of the student meetme rooms to the
instructor meetme room where they are in listen-only mode and the
instructor speaks english phrases which the students then repeat in
their own conference.
The reason this is set up this way is to allow for supervisor
monitoring of individual students as well as recording of each student
individually as they hear and repeat the phrases.
This application is in use in telemarketing schools in the Philippines
to help students learn to better speak American English.
I have tested this to 120 channels going into the instructor meetme
room across 6 servers.
Hope that helps,
MATT---
On 3/4/08, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.clara.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: | Hi Matt, thanks for your reply.
In article <61575c810803040813m7830b4bbj3cbd8939d9975711 at mail.gmail.com>,
Matt Florell <astmattf at gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: | Hello,
We have done this using IAX trunks between Asterisk servers to connect
a PRI line on server A with a meetme room on server B. We have had
hundreds of participants in meetme rooms across a dozen Asterisk
servers using this method.
Not knowing your setup I'm not sure if this would work easily for you,
but this is a somewhat-easy, scalable method for expanding meetme
capacity.
|
Is it correct to understand that in your setup, a given conference only
ever exists on a single server (presumably the one used by the first
caller), and that calls arriving on a different server are proxied
individually to whichever server is hosting the requested conference?
I can see that this would be quite easy, and would work well for lots
of smallish conferences, but might be a bit heavy for a system running
a small number of huge conferences. In the latter case, I want to look
at having a local conference on each box and bridging the conferences
together. This is the bit that gets complicated for making conf-wide
decisions
Cheers
Tony
Quote: | MATT---
On 3/4/08, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.clara.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: | Has anyone here done any work on clustering Meetme conferences over
multiple Asterisk boxes? The scenario I am thinking of is where there are
two or more boxes connected to a set of PRIs that all answer to the same
PSTN number, and where it's not possible to know in advance on which box
a call would arrive. So it would be possible to have some calls on one
box and some on another, that should all be conferenced together, by
somehow linking matching Meetme conferences on both/all boxes.
Particular complications I can envisage are the handling of marked users
(A, w and x options), call recording (r option), and MeetmeAdmin
operations such as mute all and unmute all.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|