VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mark at more-solutions... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:54 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Understanding the right way to get started |
|
|
Background: I dabbled with asterisk years ago, and more recently have
more-or-less functioning IncrediblePBX systems for experimenting, but
I want to understand more so I'm now working with distro packages
(Ubuntu) and hand edited configurations files.
I have three SIP "trunks", each providing me with a UK telephone
number. They are for my home (1), my wife's home-based bookkeeping
business (2), and for taking support calls on from work (3). For
"handsets" I only really have mobile phones running SIP/IAX clients,
although I might put a "real" desktop handset on my wife's desk at
some point.
The objective is that my wife picks up calls to (1) or (2), I pick up
calls to (2) or (3), and maybe a colleague might also pick up calls to
(3).
I can see how to do this with call groups, but I would like to be able
to see at the handset which trunk the call has come in on, which I
don't think I can do that way?
Or I could just set up multiple connections in the SIP/IAX client, so
each trunk has its own extension and we each connect to multiple
extensions as required. That has the added advantage of making the
voicemail relate to which trunk the call comes in on, which is also
more appropriate here.
However, the latter option "feels" wrong somehow and I haven't found
any examples suggesting it's the right way to do things.
Also, I am keen to minimise battery overhead on the mobile phones - is
linking to multiple accounts is less efficient?
PS: Although I only really care about inbound calls at the moment, I
daresay I will want to handle internal calls at some point too,
although nothing stops me having dedicated per-user extensions as well
as per incoming trunk.
Mark
--
Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450
Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes, MK8 0ER
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dduffett at digium.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:15 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Understanding the right way to get started |
|
|
If you would like to set things up via the GUI on your incredible PBX, you could use queues instead of call groups (making your SIP clients agents of the appropriate queues), and in the queues configuration page there is an CID Name Prefix option, which allows you to add a label that will show up as part of the caller ID - so you will see it as the call comes in.
If, on the other hand, you want to achieve your aim through native configuration files, you could add a line like:
exten => *home-number*,1,Set(CALLERID(name)=Home)
exten => *home-number*,n,*continue handling call as you were before*
This way, you will be setting the caller ID with a name label that can be observed on the SIP client before answering.
All the best,
David
On 4 March 2015 at 11:53, Mark Rogers <mark@more-solutions.co.uk (mark@more-solutions.co.uk)> wrote:
Quote: | Background: I dabbled with asterisk years ago, and more recently have
more-or-less functioning IncrediblePBX systems for experimenting, but
I want to understand more so I'm now working with distro packages
(Ubuntu) and hand edited configurations files.
I have three SIP "trunks", each providing me with a UK telephone
number. They are for my home (1), my wife's home-based bookkeeping
business (2), and for taking support calls on from work (3). For
"handsets" I only really have mobile phones running SIP/IAX clients,
although I might put a "real" desktop handset on my wife's desk at
some point.
The objective is that my wife picks up calls to (1) or (2), I pick up
calls to (2) or (3), and maybe a colleague might also pick up calls to
(3).
I can see how to do this with call groups, but I would like to be able
to see at the handset which trunk the call has come in on, which I
don't think I can do that way?
Or I could just set up multiple connections in the SIP/IAX client, so
each trunk has its own extension and we each connect to multiple
extensions as required. That has the added advantage of making the
voicemail relate to which trunk the call comes in on, which is also
more appropriate here.
However, the latter option "feels" wrong somehow and I haven't found
any examples suggesting it's the right way to do things.
Also, I am keen to minimise battery overhead on the mobile phones - is
linking to multiple accounts is less efficient?
PS: Although I only really care about inbound calls at the moment, I
daresay I will want to handle internal calls at some point too,
although nothing stops me having dedicated per-user extensions as well
as per incoming trunk.
Mark
--
Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450
Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes, MK8 0ER
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
--
David Duffett
Digium, Inc. · Director, Worldwide Asterisk Community
6 Landscape Close · Weston on the Green · Bicester · Oxfordshire OX25 3SX · UK
direct/fax: +1 256 428 6119 · mobile: +44 7722 442236
twitter: dduffett · linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/davidduffett
Check us out at: http://digium.com · http://asterisk.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark at more-solutions... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:55 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Understanding the right way to get started |
|
|
For some reason I didn't see David's reply by email, and have
copy/pasted the following from the list archives to make my reply,
sorry if that messes up anyone's threading.
On 4 March 2015 at 12:15, David Duffett wrote:
Quote: | If you would like to set things up via the GUI on your incredible PBX,
[...]
|
I'm trying to avoid a GUI for now so that I learn something, but
knowing how to do it that way is appreciated, thanks.
Quote: | If, on the other hand, you want to achieve your aim through native
configuration files, you could add a line like:
exten => *home-number*,1,Set(CALLERID(name)=Home)
exten => *home-number*,n,*continue handling call as you were before*
|
I haven't got my head round the syntax yet; will this retain the real
caller ID but add something to it, or will I lose the real ID?
From your answers I take it that it is "better" if all users have
their own extension and I route calls to the relevant extensions as
required, rather than having users monitor multiple extensions. It's
what I expected but can I ask why? Is it a scalability or performance
issue, do I lose something by not doing it this way, or is it just
about doing things "right"?
With the above, what's the best way to handle voicemail? I would
expect anyone who could have taken the call to be able to access the
voicemail, and once one person has "dealt with" a message it's no
longer a new message to anyone else.
Mark
--
Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450
Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes, MK8 0ER
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnkiniston at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:09 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Understanding the right way to get started |
|
|
In the 'home-number' example that was provided the caller ID was being replaced with the string 'Home'
It's easy to prepend the caller ID instead however.
Set(CALLERID(name)=Home-${CALLERID(name)})
You could even get fancy and set it based on what number was called, This would prepend the CallerID with the last 4 digits of the incoming number assuming that your calls come in to an extension that way:
Set(CALLERID(name)=${CDR(firstext):-4}-${CALLERID(name)})
There is no 'Best' or 'Better' way to handle extension and voicemail routing, It's all down to your preference as a programmer and your users.
Try things, Find what works best for you, The only thing you have to loose is your free time and if you are like me you will have fun during the process.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Mark Rogers <mark@more-solutions.co.uk (mark@more-solutions.co.uk)> wrote:
Quote: | For some reason I didn't see David's reply by email, and have
copy/pasted the following from the list archives to make my reply,
sorry if that messes up anyone's threading.
On 4 March 2015 at 12:15, David Duffett wrote:
Quote: | If you would like to set things up via the GUI on your incredible PBX,
[...]
|
I'm trying to avoid a GUI for now so that I learn something, but
knowing how to do it that way is appreciated, thanks.
Quote: | If, on the other hand, you want to achieve your aim through native
configuration files, you could add a line like:
exten => *home-number*,1,Set(CALLERID(name)=Home)
exten => *home-number*,n,*continue handling call as you were before*
|
I haven't got my head round the syntax yet; will this retain the real
caller ID but add something to it, or will I lose the real ID?
From your answers I take it that it is "better" if all users have
their own extension and I route calls to the relevant extensions as
required, rather than having users monitor multiple extensions. It's
what I expected but can I ask why? Is it a scalability or performance
issue, do I lose something by not doing it this way, or is it just
about doing things "right"?
With the above, what's the best way to handle voicemail? I would
expect anyone who could have taken the call to be able to access the
voicemail, and once one person has "dealt with" a message it's no
longer a new message to anyone else.
Mark
--
Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450
Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes, MK8 0ER
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
--
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
---Heinlein |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|