VoIP Mailing List Archives

[asterisk at net153.net]

Hello,

I have what I would think would be a common situation: I run asterisk at
home simply as a land line. I started a new job working remotely and
they gave me a SIP account with user name, domain, and proxy. I've never
had to deal with sip domains before. My user '140@4354766787.com' is
handled by a 3rd party provider: 'sip.provider.com' and my local domain
on my asterisk box is the hostname 'mypbxdomain.com'.

My normal extension I use for everything is just '111'. I figured the
best way of joining my asterisk box was to just hard code in the
extensions I would need to dial for my remote office work (there are
only a couple of extensions so shouldn't be a big deal).

However I struggled to get authentication working for outgoing calls to
the few new extensions at the remote office through their provider.
Looking at debug logs it was clear that the sip 'To' address was wrong.
It had the provider: "To: <sip:139@sip.provider.com>" instead of the
domain which should look like: "To: <sip:139@4354766787.com>" (right?)

In the end, after hours of googling, reading the docs on sip.conf
several times revealed a little spoke of '!' dialplan option. Simply
changing my dialplan from 'Dial(SIP/workphone/${EXTEN})' to
'Dial(SIP/workphone/${EXTEN}!${EXTEN}@4354766787.com)' fixed the issue.

But this seems really hackish. Is this the right/only way? Or is just
having a provider and mismatched domains not really the norm?

I have an an anonymized log here: http://tinyurl.com/ouy2ajr



Regards,
Sam

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk at net153.net]

On 08/21/2015 12:52 AM, Sam wrote:

[royj at yandex.ru]

I think you chose the right solution in your case. It might doesn't "feel" right if you corrected source code, I think.

23.08.2015, 20:53, "Sam" <asterisk@net153.net>: