VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tzafrir.cohen at xorco... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:59 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:31:03AM -0500, John Faubion wrote:
Quote: | Quote: | I reboot every evening Drew, what's the uptime on your
asterisk process on that box that's been up for 193 days?
|
I too restart the asterisk process every night as part of the cron process.
Many people here seem to be under the impression that restarting the
application every day is a bad thing.
|
It is a bad thing when people consider it a magic bullet.
It "cures" slow resource leaks. But faster resource drains will still
be able to crash Asterisk. Strange races will still happen once in a
million.
And people have actually suggested recently in this list a scheduled
reboot as a cure for deadlock issues.
And what happens if at the time of the shutdown there was a |
|
Back to top |
|
|
norman at myasd.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:10 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
On Mar 20, 2008, at 12:59 AM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
wrote:
Quote: | Sure some others on here may disagree, but I am also over on the
trixbox
forums, and have often seen talk about the 2.6.9 kernel having
interrupt
issues, and such that cause asterisk issues. One reason I think
they moved
forward into the CentOS 5.x stuff, so they got the 2.6.18 kernel,
which I am
told works much better, and doesn't have the issues the old kernel
did.
| I've also found that I can't get ztdummy working on anything less
than 2.6.23.11. Previous versions seem to have a broken RTC.
Norman Franke
Answering Service for Directors, Inc.
www.myasd.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080320/d556b7ca/attachment-0001.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
norman at myasd.com Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
louwrens at jasper.co.za Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:43 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
I was running Trixbox 2.2 up until about 2 months ago, and had persistent
interrupt issues. I upgraded to 2.4, with the updated kernel, and it?s been
complete smooth sailing ever since.
_____
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Norman Franke
Sent: 20 March 2008 05:10 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time?
On Mar 20, 2008, at 12:59 AM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote:
Sure some others on here may disagree, but I am also over on the trixbox
forums, and have often seen talk about the 2.6.9 kernel having interrupt
issues, and such that cause asterisk issues. One reason I think they moved
forward into the CentOS 5.x stuff, so they got the 2.6.18 kernel, which I am
told works much better, and doesn't have the issues the old kernel did.
I've also found that I can't get ztdummy working on anything less than
2.6.23.11. Previous versions seem to have a broken RTC.
Norman Franke
Answering Service for Directors, Inc.
www.myasd.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080320/e63c6199/attachment.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tzafrir.cohen at xorco... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:49 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:10:21AM -0400, Norman Franke wrote:
Quote: | On Mar 20, 2008, at 12:59 AM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
wrote:
Quote: | Sure some others on here may disagree, but I am also over on the
trixbox
forums, and have often seen talk about the 2.6.9 kernel having
interrupt
issues, and such that cause asterisk issues. One reason I think
they moved
forward into the CentOS 5.x stuff, so they got the 2.6.18 kernel,
which I am
told works much better, and doesn't have the issues the old kernel
did.
|
I've also found that I can't get ztdummy working on anything less
than 2.6.23.11. Previous versions seem to have a broken RTC.
|
RTC? on kernel 2.6.23? It should not be used in kernel >= 2.6.22 if
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is enabled.
Also note that on kernel 2.6.9 you have HZ=1000 and thus ztdummy works
quite differently. This is not the same issue as interrupts of PCI
devices.
(not to mention that hotplug on CentOS 4 is strange. And earlier
CentOS4 versions had a plain broken USB stack).
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jnovack at stromberg-c... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:35 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
John Faubion wrote:
Quote: | Quote: | Although this is a "users" list, I think it is more of a list for
Asterisk "resellers". I'd be interested in how many of you are simply using Asterisk as your phone system and NOT selling your services or an Asterisk based solution?
|
I actually work as a software engineer for a big telecom manufacturer to remain unnamed. I use Asterisk at home and I built a system for my aunt's real estate office mainly because she was quoted $83K+ over 5 years for a 12 station Toshiba key system.
| What on earth does that system do? open the office, make coffee, sweep
the floors and ???
For such a small system there is no earthly reason for it to be 10
percent of that, even on a 5 year lease.
Unless there are contract reasons she shouldn't even consider a lease
either.
I know that EVERYTHING is big in Texas, but that is nothing more than
highway robbery.
An NEC DSX with CF voicemail and e-mail integration wholesales for well
under 3K, double that and add cabling . . .
Well, you get the idea.
John Novack
--
Dog is my co-pilot |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfaubion at tx.rr.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:59 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
Quote: | For such a small system there is no earthly reason for it to
be 10 percent of that, even on a 5 year lease.
I know that EVERYTHING is big in Texas, but that is nothing
more than highway robbery.
|
I fully agreed, that's why we built her an Asterisk based system. Splitting
this up they wanted $724 per month for the hardware and maintenance. This
did include a "special" kind of lease where they could upgrade as necessary
even if it required them to change out the system to do the upgrade. I'm not
sure what that is worth but I'm fairly sure it shouldn't cost this much. The
monthly contract for the Integrated PRI was another $675 per month. My aunt
couldn't see how she was going to afford that so she called me for advice. I
originally steered her toward a key system until I realized she would
eventually need 35-40 stations. So we rolled our own asterisk based system.
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:30 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
No, I meant if I leave this office, what to do when the cpu fan or power
supply breaks on our current * box They might just be so worried
that they'd *want* something like the 3Com V3000
Steve Totaro wrote:
Quote: | Call your dealer as I am sure you would have a support contract.
Haven't really seen one "break" yet though. VxWorks is what runs
satellites and junk
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC
<mojo at horanappraisals.com> wrote:
Quote: | Steve Totaro wrote:
Quote: | Anyways, as to the four FXO system, I would not think twice to steer
that customer to the 3Com V3000.
| Interesting When I (the tech guy) leave this office, they just
*could* be asking me what to do when it breaks? lol
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
anselm at hoffmeister-... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:33 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 16:59 +0200 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
Quote: | And what happens if at the time of the shutdown there was a
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
|
ROTFL
Trafrir, you made my day.
(BTW: I think that is why "restart when convenient" exists)
Anselm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aklists at mixdown.ca Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:43 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
On March 20, 2008 02:33:52 pm Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
Quote: | Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 16:59 +0200 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
Quote: | And what happens if at the time of the shutdown there was a
|
|
Quote: | ROTFL
Trafrir, you made my day.
|
Oh god, I didn't realize that wasn't a typo until you wrote that...
Very well done, Tzafir. Professionally executed.
-A. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lists at darl.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:01 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
Al Baker wrote:
Quote: | Quote"
This code is pre-Asterisk 1.0... It processes quite a few calls daily, I
have about 1,800 DID numbers pointed at it, "
Are you SURE on that figure. Since you cold have at MOST 4 T1's coming into that box, 1,800 DIDs pointing to it sems like
one hell of a congestion problem and a Dialplan thicker than War and Peace
| I said DID numbers, they point to a PRI trunk group to a T400P, then the
calls go IAX2 to other boxes for processing based on NPA/NXX.
IE: exten=>_906586XXXX,1,Dial,IAX2/un:pw at asterisk50/${EXTEN}@ninezerosix
And if anything comes in for something not configured this catches it
exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,1,Dial,sip/sipdebug/s
If you figure standard telco usage patters, 92 channels @ 25:1 ratio, I
have quite a bit of headroom.
-Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stotaro at totarotechn... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:01 PM, RE Kushner List Account <lists at darl.com> wrote:
Quote: | Al Baker wrote:
Quote: | Quote"
This code is pre-Asterisk 1.0... It processes quite a few calls daily, I
have about 1,800 DID numbers pointed at it, "
Are you SURE on that figure. Since you cold have at MOST 4 T1's coming into that box, 1,800 DIDs pointing to it sems like
one hell of a congestion problem and a Dialplan thicker than War and Peace
| I said DID numbers, they point to a PRI trunk group to a T400P, then the
calls go IAX2 to other boxes for processing based on NPA/NXX.
IE: exten=>_906586XXXX,1,Dial,IAX2/un:pw at asterisk50/${EXTEN}@ninezerosix
And if anything comes in for something not configured this catches it
exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,1,Dial,sip/sipdebug/s
If you figure standard telco usage patters, 92 channels @ 25:1 ratio, I
have quite a bit of headroom.
-Ron
|
You don't run into choppy audio with IAX that way? I see that alot
and the simple solution is to switch to SIP, almost always solves the
problem right away.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lists at darl.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:56 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
Steve Totaro wrote:
Quote: | On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:01 PM, RE Kushner List Account <lists at darl.com> wrote:
Quote: | Al Baker wrote:
Quote: | Quote"
This code is pre-Asterisk 1.0... It processes quite a few calls daily, I
have about 1,800 DID numbers pointed at it, "
Are you SURE on that figure. Since you cold have at MOST 4 T1's coming into that box, 1,800 DIDs pointing to it sems like
one hell of a congestion problem and a Dialplan thicker than War and Peace
| I said DID numbers, they point to a PRI trunk group to a T400P, then the
calls go IAX2 to other boxes for processing based on NPA/NXX.
IE: exten=>_906586XXXX,1,Dial,IAX2/un:pw at asterisk50/${EXTEN}@ninezerosix
And if anything comes in for something not configured this catches it
exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,1,Dial,sip/sipdebug/s
If you figure standard telco usage patters, 92 channels @ 25:1 ratio, I
have quite a bit of headroom.
-Ron
|
You don't run into choppy audio with IAX that way? I see that alot
and the simple solution is to switch to SIP, almost always solves the
problem right away.
|
Not really, but both ends have zaptel hardware. I'm really surprised
IAX2 connects and functions to these 1.4 and 1.6 beta servers from a Pre
1.0 machine.
-Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gordon+asterisk at dro... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:06 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Norman Franke wrote:
Quote: | On Mar 20, 2008, at 12:59 AM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote:
Quote: | Sure some others on here may disagree, but I am also over on the trixbox
forums, and have often seen talk about the 2.6.9 kernel having interrupt
issues, and such that cause asterisk issues. One reason I think they moved
forward into the CentOS 5.x stuff, so they got the 2.6.18 kernel, which I
am
told works much better, and doesn't have the issues the old kernel did.
|
I've also found that I can't get ztdummy working on anything less than
2.6.23.11. Previous versions seem to have a broken RTC.
|
It works fine...
# uname -a
Linux dsx 2.6.18DSX1-CN #8 PREEMPT Fri May 18 16:13:30 BST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
zttranscode 6408 0
ztdummy 2632 0
zaptel 182788 4 zttranscode,ztdummy
# zttest -v
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344%
8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344%
8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344%
8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344%
--- Results after 9 passes ---
Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.902344 -- Average: 99.956597
This is running on a 1GHz VIA C3 processor - no RTC, custom compiled
kernel and zaptel compiled from source...
Gordon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowym at hotmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time? |
|
|
That probably includes 5 years of support but still expensive.
John Faubion wrote:
Quote: | Quote: | Although this is a "users" list, I think it is more of a list for
Asterisk "resellers". I'd be interested in how many of you are simply
|
| using Asterisk as your phone system and NOT selling your services or an
Asterisk based solution?
Quote: |
I actually work as a software engineer for a big telecom manufacturer to
| remain unnamed. I use Asterisk at home and I built a system for my aunt's
real estate office mainly because she was quoted $83K+ over 5 years for a 12
station Toshiba key system.
What on earth does that system do? open the office, make coffee, sweep
the floors and ???
For such a small system there is no earthly reason for it to be 10
percent of that, even on a 5 year lease.
Unless there are contract reasons she shouldn't even consider a lease
either.
I know that EVERYTHING is big in Texas, but that is nothing more than
highway robbery.
An NEC DSX with CF voicemail and e-mail integration wholesales for well
under 3K, double that and add cabling . . .
Well, you get the idea.
John Novack
--
Dog is my co-pilot |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|