VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
moises.silva at gmail.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:28 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
 |
|
If you are an MFC/R2 user and want to help in the development of
chan_zap support for this signalling, please take a look at the
bugtracker at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12509 and/or contact
me. Currently just M?xico support is built-in, if you want your
country variant supported, drop me a line.
Mois?s Silva
--
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vinicius at canall.com.br
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:29 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
Hello Mois?s, thanks for your effort on this! I would love to use Digium cards for MFC/R2 signalling in the future.
I added some info you might like in the bugtracker, you might take a look at it.
Att
Vin?cius Fontes
Desenvolvimento
Canall Tecnologia em Comunica??es Ltda.
----- "Moises Silva" <moises.silva at gmail.com> escreveu:
| Quote: | If you are an MFC/R2 user and want to help in the development of
chan_zap support for this signalling, please take a look at the
bugtracker at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12509 and/or contact
me. Currently just M?xico support is built-in, if you want your
country variant supported, drop me a line.
Mois?s Silva
--
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." Voltaire
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ruben.zamora at zys.co...
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:26 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
Moises
Thats means, that we arent going to use unicall?
If that true i can test these weekend with a E1-Axtel.
Thanks
Ruben
Moises Silva escribi?:
| Quote: | If you are an MFC/R2 user and want to help in the development of
chan_zap support for this signalling, please take a look at the
bugtracker at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12509 and/or contact
me. Currently just M?xico support is built-in, if you want your
country variant supported, drop me a line.
Mois?s Silva
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
moises.silva at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:57 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
| Quote: | Hello Mois?s, thanks for your effort on this! I would love to use Digium cards for MFC/R2 signalling in the future.
|
Currently you can use Digium cards with Unicall  , tho, having
MFC/R2 on chan_zap is more handy.
| Quote: | I added some info you might like in the bugtracker, you might take a look at it.
|
I will, thanks!
Mois?s Silva
--
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
moises.silva at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:02 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
Hello Ruben,
Yes, if you consider using R2 support in chan_zap Unicall is no longer
required. I will be not available online this weekend, please let me
know your feedback after your try it. We can also meet via MSN so I
can assist you in testing the next weeked (3-4 May).
Thanks for the help.
Mois?s Silva
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Ruben Zamora <ruben.zamora at zys.com.mx> wrote:
| Quote: | Moises
Thats means, that we arent going to use unicall?
If that true i can test these weekend with a E1-Axtel.
Thanks
Ruben
Moises Silva escribi?:
| Quote: | If you are an MFC/R2 user and want to help in the development of
chan_zap support for this signalling, please take a look at the
bugtracker at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12509 and/or contact
me. Currently just M?xico support is built-in, if you want your
country variant supported, drop me a line.
Mois?s Silva
|
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
--
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vinicius at canall.com.br
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:55 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
| Quote: | | Quote: | Hello Mois?s, thanks for your effort on this! I would love to use
|
Digium cards for MFC/R2 signalling in the future.
Currently you can use Digium cards with Unicall , tho, having
MFC/R2 on chan_zap is more handy.
|
Way more handy and will be much more reliable too. Steve Underwood did a great job implemeting it, but as far as I know the code isn't actively maintained anymore. Of course your implementation of MFC/R2 will take a while to become stable, but hey -- it's a start.
| Quote: | | Quote: | I added some info you might like in the bugtracker, you might take
|
a look at it.
I will, thanks!
|
Russel pointed some licensing stuff related to the Digivoice drivers. Please listen to him on that, I had no idea of that kind of complication. If your implementation of MFC/R2 can't be integrated in Zaptel, then it's no much better than Unicall.
I guess if you look at Digivoice's code to figure out how it works and then write your own code, there will be no licensing issues. But that's just a guess, Russel will need to clarify it.
You can count on me for any testing needed on the BR variant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
moises.silva at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
| Quote: | Way more handy and will be much more reliable too. Steve Underwood did a great job implemeting it, but as far as I know the code isn't actively
maintained anymore. Of course your implementation of MFC/R2 will take a while to become stable, but hey -- it's a start.
|
Agreed.
| Quote: | Russel pointed some licensing stuff related to the Digivoice drivers. Please listen to him on that, I had no idea of that kind of complication. If your
implementation of MFC/R2 can't be integrated in Zaptel, then it's no much better than Unicall.
|
You mean chan_zap/zapata (zaptel is the kernel code). I had already
discussed with Russell the licensing. He just got confused for a
second because he forgot LGPL code requires both license files (GPL
and LGPL).
| Quote: | I guess if you look at Digivoice's code to figure out how it works and then write your own code, there will be no licensing issues. But that's just a guess,
Russel will need to clarify it.
|
I did not discussed that with Russell, but I will. In the meantime,
since I am aware of the licensing concerns I have not even looked at
that code
I would like to test the BR variant the next week, I will contact you
off-list to see if we can meet via IM.
- Mois?s Silva
--
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
moises.silva at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:03 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
| Quote: | Unicall MFC/R2 is activelly maintained. by Moy. Actually it's a backport of the Steve driver (now coded for Callweaver derivative) to Asterisk (1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 soon). It works pretty well. In fact, it works more stable in 1.4 than the original Steve driver in 1.2, and with better sound under heavy loads.
The Asutunicall page can be found here:
http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/
|
Hum, wonder who this moy is .... hey wait, that's me! . Even when is
in my plans to keep giving general maintenance to chan_unicall, my
long term plan is to leave R2 support into chan_zap, so I would
recommend to all users to try chan_zap R2 support, the more users we
get the faster the driver will be stable enough to replace
chan_unicall, the less headaches you will have (I hope).
- Moy or Mois?s Silva, same shit
--
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lethol at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:07 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] MFC/R2 in chan_zap , Testers Wanted |
|
|
Congrats on going forward with the project Moises. MFC/R2 support on
chan_zap sounds great, looking forward on trying it out.
Regards,
Lex
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Moises Silva <moises.silva at gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | | Quote: | Unicall MFC/R2 is activelly maintained. by Moy. Actually it's a backport of the Steve driver (now coded for Callweaver derivative) to Asterisk (1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 soon). It works pretty well. In fact, it works more stable in 1.4 than the original Steve driver in 1.2, and with better sound under heavy loads.
The Asutunicall page can be found here:
http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/
|
Hum, wonder who this moy is .... hey wait, that's me! . Even when is
in my plans to keep giving general maintenance to chan_unicall, my
long term plan is to leave R2 support into chan_zap, so I would
recommend to all users to try chan_zap R2 support, the more users we
get the faster the driver will be stable enough to replace
chan_unicall, the less headaches you will have (I hope).
- Moy or Mois?s Silva, same shit
--
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." Voltaire
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Search
