VoIP Mailing List Archives

[jalsot at gmail.com]

Hi,

Have you seen this?
http://openbts.sourceforge.net/background.html

I guess, FreeSWITCH would be better for this

Regards,
Tamas

_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[msc at freeswitch.org]

OpenBTS is GPLv3... may have OS licensing issues trying to make that happen.
-MC

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Tamas <jalsot@gmail.com (jalsot@gmail.com)> wrote:

[steveu at coppice.org]

Hi,

It is almost certainly trivial to avoid licencing issues through the use
of sockets. The overhead for socket communication would be no real issue
in this case, as the processing for the GSM stack will be so heavy, you
won't really notice the difference using sockets.

The openbts site makes light of the GSM protocols. It has taken huge
efforts over long periods for each GSM stack supplier to shake out their
wares. That has typically involved extented evaluations of why certain
specific spots on a network cause call drops (e.g. 50% of calls in cars
emerging from this particular tunnel drop as they emerge). Achieving a
usable stack is not for the faint hearted.

Regards,
Steve


Michael Collins wrote: