VoIP Mailing List Archives

[krisedwards at gmail.com]

Is anyone running Lumenvox on Gentoo? My asterisk install has been running
like a champ for a few years now and I really hate the thoughts of changing
distros just for Lumenvox.

Here is my issue:

The engine needs the libs from boost. I emerged boost and noticed that
there were four libs that the engine were looking for that were not
installed via portage.

libboost_regex.so.2
libboost_thread.so.2
libboost_filesystem.so.2
libboost_date_time.so.2

Instead, I had the above libs without the .2 at the end. I created symlinks
in the engines lib folder.

Now, when I try to execute the bin I get:
./LVSRE_SERVER: symbol lookup error:
/opt/lumenvox/engine/lib/liblv_lvspeechserver.so: undefined symbol:
_ZN5boost10filesystem8no_checkERKSs

I am using the redhat package. I haven't tried rpath or debian yet (which
I'm about to do now). Just thought maybe someone might have a thought on
what I should try.

FYI: I also tried un-emerging boost and building directly from the official
release (1.35 I belive). Perhaps there is a ./configure option I need to
get this to work right. I have little experience with redhat and 0
experience with rpath or debian. I simply used rpm2tar and moved things
appropriately.

Thanks!

-Kris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080604/d2212c0c/attachment.htm

[dbackeberg at gmail.com]

Make sure you enable all the USE flags, and then perhaps try
emerge boost
again

I've had times where leaving out a badly named USE flag meant that
critical things didn't end up getting built. A particularly egregious
"must enable all USE flags" case is if you try
emerge ejabberd

Without all the USE flags, especially mod_irc (WTF!) you end up with a
useless daemon. Why would you let anybody emerge a chat daemon with no
support for chat?

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Kris Edwards <krisedwards at gmail.com> wrote:

[krisedwards at gmail.com]

Solved -

I thought I would follow up in case anyone else on the list is using
gentoo. Got some guidance from the gentoo forum. There is a difference in
this function between 1.33 and 1.34 (1.34 is current in gentoo portage)

1.33:
BOOST_FILESYSTEM_DECL bool no_check( const std::string & name ); //
always returns true

1.34:
inline bool no_check( const std::string & ) { return true; }
As a quick test, I just built 1.33.1 from source and it works. Eventually I
will try emerge =boost-1.33.1 so I can stick with portage. If anyone is on
gentoo currently, be careful about upgrading boost.

Thanks for the reply.

-Kris

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:20 PM, David Backeberg <dbackeberg at gmail.com>
wrote: