VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pabelanger at gmail.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:38 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] decrease the time it takes for asterisk (fx |
 |
|
Morning list,
Was curious if it is possible to decrease the time asterisk takes to
answer an incoming call to a zaptel interface.
Example:
[Jun 11 09:33:06] VERBOSE[4489] logger.c: -- Starting simple
switch on 'Zap/2-1'
[Jun 11 09:33:10] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 18 (Ring Begin)...
[Jun 11 09:33:12] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)...
[Jun 11 09:33:12] VERBOSE[4489] logger.c: -- Executing
[s at from-zap:1] Dial("Zap/2-1", "SIP/sv0071iv") in new stack
Asterisk first sees the incoming call at 09:33:06, but +4 seconds
later it detects the ring, then +2 more seconds it answers and execute
our extensions.conf programming. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pabelanger at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:03 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] decrease the time it takes for asterisk (fx |
|
|
Here is our zapata.conf:
---
[channels]
language=en
context=from-zap
usecallerid=yes
busydetect=yes
busypattern=500,500
busycount=3
callprogress=yes
progzone=us
signalling = auto
group = 1
channel => 1-24
group = 2
channel => 25-48
---
Thought immediate=yes might fix the problem, but seems to have no
affect. Below is its description.
---
;
; Specify whether the channel should be answered immediately or if the simple
; switch should provide dialtone, read digits, etc.
; Note: If immediate=yes the dialplan execution will always start at extension
; 's' priority 1 regardless of the dialed number!
;
;immediate=yes
---
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelanger at gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Morning list,
Was curious if it is possible to decrease the time asterisk takes to
answer an incoming call to a zaptel interface.
Example:
[Jun 11 09:33:06] VERBOSE[4489] logger.c: -- Starting simple
switch on 'Zap/2-1'
[Jun 11 09:33:10] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 18 (Ring Begin)...
[Jun 11 09:33:12] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)...
[Jun 11 09:33:12] VERBOSE[4489] logger.c: -- Executing
[s at from-zap:1] Dial("Zap/2-1", "SIP/sv0071iv") in new stack
Asterisk first sees the incoming call at 09:33:06, but +4 seconds
later it detects the ring, then +2 more seconds it answers and execute
our extensions.conf programming.
From start to finish it take 6 seconds for asterisk to process an
incoming call... is there any way to shorten this time frame?
Thanks,
PB
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stotaro at totarotechn...
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] decrease the time it takes for asterisk (fx |
|
|
Do you actually have callerID on your line? That takes about two
seconds. Try removing it and see how much faster Asterisk answers.
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the phone rings right away, it just doesn't display caller ID info
until a couple of rings. Why not have that option in Asterisk?
Thanks,
Steve T
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelanger at gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Here is our zapata.conf:
---
[channels]
language=en
context=from-zap
usecallerid=yes
busydetect=yes
busypattern=500,500
busycount=3
callprogress=yes
progzone=us
signalling = auto
group = 1
channel => 1-24
group = 2
channel => 25-48
---
Thought immediate=yes might fix the problem, but seems to have no
affect. Below is its description.
---
;
; Specify whether the channel should be answered immediately or if the simple
; switch should provide dialtone, read digits, etc.
; Note: If immediate=yes the dialplan execution will always start at extension
; 's' priority 1 regardless of the dialed number!
;
;immediate=yes
---
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelanger at gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Morning list,
Was curious if it is possible to decrease the time asterisk takes to
answer an incoming call to a zaptel interface.
Example:
[Jun 11 09:33:06] VERBOSE[4489] logger.c: -- Starting simple
switch on 'Zap/2-1'
[Jun 11 09:33:10] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 18 (Ring Begin)...
[Jun 11 09:33:12] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)...
[Jun 11 09:33:12] VERBOSE[4489] logger.c: -- Executing
[s at from-zap:1] Dial("Zap/2-1", "SIP/sv0071iv") in new stack
Asterisk first sees the incoming call at 09:33:06, but +4 seconds
later it detects the ring, then +2 more seconds it answers and execute
our extensions.conf programming.
From start to finish it take 6 seconds for asterisk to process an
incoming call... is there any way to shorten this time frame?
Thanks,
PB
|
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stotaro at totarotechn...
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:38 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] decrease the time it takes for asterisk (fx |
|
|
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Brian J. Murrell
<brian at interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 10:12 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
| Quote: | Do you actually have callerID on your line? That takes about two
seconds. Try removing it and see how much faster Asterisk answers.
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the phone rings right away, it just doesn't display caller ID info
until a couple of rings. Why not have that option in Asterisk?
|
You mean like I asked in my question "SIP call, updated with CID as it
becomes available" just an hour ago? 
b.
|
Exactly! It is funny how when idea or technology is ready, many
people have the same thougts at the same time. There should be a
study about that concept.
It's almost like a collective conscience.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pabelanger at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:47 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] decrease the time it takes for asterisk (fx |
|
|
Thanks Steve,
Forgot about callerID. We are not using callerID on the lines and
have disabled it. Asterisk now answers right away.
Thanks again,
PB
| Quote: | Do you actually have callerID on your line? That takes about two
seconds. Try removing it and see how much faster Asterisk answers.
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the phone rings right away, it just doesn't display caller ID info
until a couple of rings. Why not have that option in Asterisk?
Thanks,
Steve T |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stotaro at totarotechn...
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:21 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] decrease the time it takes for asterisk (fx |
|
|
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Brian J. Murrell
<brian at interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
| Quote: |
Exactly! It is funny how when idea or technology is ready, many
people have the same thougts at the same time.
|
Indeed. But what is even more interesting is that this technology is
not "just ready". It's been ready for a long time and indeed I have had
this thought in my mind for many months now. I have only just now
chosen to express it. Why now, along with somebody else, within an hour
of each other? Very strange.
| Quote: | There should be a
study about that concept.
|
Heh. I wonder if I can get a grant.
b.
|
The truth of it is I have thought about that since the early days of
Asterisk but it was not a top concern and now I do almost exclusively
T1s, so it is not an issue.
Thanks,
Steve T |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Search
