VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jalsot at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:56 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question |
|
|
Hello,
I've talked about CNG, VAD with Anthony and Brian already but I still
have a mess in it and don't really know how it works.
Could anybody explain the practical side of these magic options?
1. What does suppress_cng=true do exactly? (yep, I know it suppresses
CNG, but what does this mean? Won't send out the CN/8000 rtpmap in SDP?)
2. What do VAD settings do in sofia profile? I've read
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia.conf.xml
<!-- <param name="vad" value="in"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="out"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="both"/> -->
What do these options do in practice? Can FS detect silence (e.g. no
RTP?) and than what can it do with?
3. I found undocumented options rtp_enable_vad_in, rtp_enable_vad_out
for sofia which might be the per call settings for point 2. ? If this is
correct, what will this do?
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_in=true"/>
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_out=true"/>
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/....."/>
4. What will FS do when one side of the bridge supports CN but the other
doesn't?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN
Would it be possible to turn on comfort noise generation in FS for the
side which cannot handle CN?
5. Is it possible to let FS detect silence and on one leg send CN
packets insted of RTP?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN, but for saving bandwidth it would be
good to have silence detection and in case of silence FS lets send CN
instead of RTP.
Sorry for my dump questions, I would like to understand the whole picture.
I would like to add the clarification to FS wiki to lets other have less
troubles (with endpoints on one side supporting VAD/CNG and endpoints on
other side not supporting VAD/CNG, e.g. CallWeaver)
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jalsot at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:15 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question |
|
|
Hello,
Thanks for guys on IRC channel, now things around VAD/CNG are more clear
for me.
I've started a wiki documentation about the topic as there is no such
page yet and I hope it will be a good startup:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
I'm aware of that some parts might be inaccurate and even wrong, so bear
with me, I just took the time to start document this part.
I would like to ask the gurus (anthm, bkw, coppice, etc.) to review the
page and correct my mistakes.
Thanks!
Regards,
Tamas
Tamas írta:
Quote: | Hello,
I've talked about CNG, VAD with Anthony and Brian already but I still
have a mess in it and don't really know how it works.
Could anybody explain the practical side of these magic options?
1. What does suppress_cng=true do exactly? (yep, I know it suppresses
CNG, but what does this mean? Won't send out the CN/8000 rtpmap in SDP?)
2. What do VAD settings do in sofia profile? I've read
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia.conf.xml
<!-- <param name="vad" value="in"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="out"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="both"/> -->
What do these options do in practice? Can FS detect silence (e.g. no
RTP?) and than what can it do with?
3. I found undocumented options rtp_enable_vad_in, rtp_enable_vad_out
for sofia which might be the per call settings for point 2. ? If this is
correct, what will this do?
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_in=true"/>
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_out=true"/>
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/....."/>
4. What will FS do when one side of the bridge supports CN but the other
doesn't?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN
Would it be possible to turn on comfort noise generation in FS for the
side which cannot handle CN?
5. Is it possible to let FS detect silence and on one leg send CN
packets insted of RTP?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN, but for saving bandwidth it would be
good to have silence detection and in case of silence FS lets send CN
instead of RTP.
Sorry for my dump questions, I would like to understand the whole picture.
I would like to add the clarification to FS wiki to lets other have less
troubles (with endpoints on one side supporting VAD/CNG and endpoints on
other side not supporting VAD/CNG, e.g. CallWeaver)
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Tamas
|
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jalsot at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 7:35 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question |
|
|
Hello,
to answer for my own email - for other who might be interested...
Tamas írta:
Quote: | Hello,
I've talked about CNG, VAD with Anthony and Brian already but I still
have a mess in it and don't really know how it works.
Could anybody explain the practical side of these magic options?
1. What does suppress_cng=true do exactly? (yep, I know it suppresses
CNG, but what does this mean? Won't send out the CN/8000 rtpmap in SDP?)
| suppress-cng and suppress_cng are used to manage the sending of CN RTP
packets after agreement through SDP.
Quote: | 2. What do VAD settings do in sofia profile? I've read
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia.conf.xml
<!-- <param name="vad" value="in"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="out"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="both"/> -->
What do these options do in practice? Can FS detect silence (e.g. no
RTP?) and than what can it do with?
| When VAD is turnd on, FS checks on the given channel for incoming or/and
outgoing channel (depends on the settings) and when detects silence,
stops sending out RTP.
Quote: | 3. I found undocumented options rtp_enable_vad_in, rtp_enable_vad_out
for sofia which might be the per call settings for point 2. ? If this is
correct, what will this do?
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_in=true"/>
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_out=true"/>
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/....."/>
| These settings are the same as in 1. but can be used per call.
Quote: | 4. What will FS do when one side of the bridge supports CN but the other
doesn't?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN
Would it be possible to turn on comfort noise generation in FS for the
side which cannot handle CN?
| When on side does not support CN, FS simply won't forward CN RTP
packets. Comfort noise generation into media channel in FS is possible with
bridge_generate_comfort_noise=true
added in r9543. More about on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
Quote: | 5. Is it possible to let FS detect silence and on one leg send CN
packets insted of RTP?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN, but for saving bandwidth it would be
good to have silence detection and in case of silence FS lets send CN
instead of RTP.
| Yes, possible. VAD has to be turned on that channel and both sides have
to agree on CN RTP packets (in SDP).
Quote: | Sorry for my dump questions, I would like to understand the whole picture.
| I hope I'm on the right way
Quote: | I would like to add the clarification to FS wiki to lets other have less
troubles (with endpoints on one side supporting VAD/CNG and endpoints on
other side not supporting VAD/CNG, e.g. CallWeaver)
| Check
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
Quote: | Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Tamas
|
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thomas.Sluschny at sie... Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:19 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question |
|
|
thank you very much Tamas,
i found this infos very useful
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Tamas
Gesendet: Samstag, 13. September 2008 14:31
An: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question
Hello,
to answer for my own email - for other who might be interested...
Tamas írta:
Quote: | Hello,
I've talked about CNG, VAD with Anthony and Brian already but I still
have a mess in it and don't really know how it works.
Could anybody explain the practical side of these magic options?
1. What does suppress_cng=true do exactly? (yep, I know it suppresses
CNG, but what does this mean? Won't send out the CN/8000 rtpmap in SDP?)
| suppress-cng and suppress_cng are used to manage the sending of CN RTP
packets after agreement through SDP.
Quote: | 2. What do VAD settings do in sofia profile? I've read
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia.conf.xml
<!-- <param name="vad" value="in"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="out"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="both"/> -->
What do these options do in practice? Can FS detect silence (e.g. no
RTP?) and than what can it do with?
| When VAD is turnd on, FS checks on the given channel for incoming or/and
outgoing channel (depends on the settings) and when detects silence,
stops sending out RTP.
Quote: | 3. I found undocumented options rtp_enable_vad_in, rtp_enable_vad_out
for sofia which might be the per call settings for point 2. ? If this is
correct, what will this do?
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_in=true"/>
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_out=true"/>
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/....."/>
| These settings are the same as in 1. but can be used per call.
Quote: | 4. What will FS do when one side of the bridge supports CN but the other
doesn't?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN
Would it be possible to turn on comfort noise generation in FS for the
side which cannot handle CN?
| When on side does not support CN, FS simply won't forward CN RTP
packets. Comfort noise generation into media channel in FS is possible with
bridge_generate_comfort_noise=true
added in r9543. More about on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
Quote: | 5. Is it possible to let FS detect silence and on one leg send CN
packets insted of RTP?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN, but for saving bandwidth it would be
good to have silence detection and in case of silence FS lets send CN
instead of RTP.
| Yes, possible. VAD has to be turned on that channel and both sides have
to agree on CN RTP packets (in SDP).
Quote: | Sorry for my dump questions, I would like to understand the whole picture.
| I hope I'm on the right way
Quote: | I would like to add the clarification to FS wiki to lets other have less
troubles (with endpoints on one side supporting VAD/CNG and endpoints on
other side not supporting VAD/CNG, e.g. CallWeaver)
| Check
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
Quote: | Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Tamas
|
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike at jerris.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:50 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question |
|
|
A big thanks to Tamas and Steve Underwood for putting this new page together:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
Mike
On Sep 15, 2008, at 5:14 AM, Sluschny, Thomas wrote:
Quote: | thank you very much Tamas,
i found this infos very useful
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org (freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org)] Im Auftrag von Tamas
Gesendet: Samstag, 13. September 2008 14:31
An: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org (freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org)
Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question
Hello,
to answer for my own email - for other who might be interested...
Tamas írta:
Quote: | Hello,
I've talked about CNG, VAD with Anthony and Brian already but I still
have a mess in it and don't really know how it works.
Could anybody explain the practical side of these magic options?
1. What does suppress_cng=true do exactly? (yep, I know it suppresses
CNG, but what does this mean? Won't send out the CN/8000 rtpmap in SDP?)
| suppress-cng and suppress_cng are used to manage the sending of CN RTP
packets after agreement through SDP.
Quote: | 2. What do VAD settings do in sofia profile? I've read
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia.conf.xml
<!-- <param name="vad" value="in"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="out"/> -->
<!-- <param name="vad" value="both"/> -->
What do these options do in practice? Can FS detect silence (e.g. no
RTP?) and than what can it do with?
| When VAD is turnd on, FS checks on the given channel for incoming or/and
outgoing channel (depends on the settings) and when detects silence,
stops sending out RTP.
Quote: | 3. I found undocumented options rtp_enable_vad_in, rtp_enable_vad_out
for sofia which might be the per call settings for point 2. ? If this is
correct, what will this do?
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_in=true"/>
<action application="set" data="rtp_enable_vad_out=true"/>
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/....."/>
| These settings are the same as in 1. but can be used per call.
Quote: | 4. What will FS do when one side of the bridge supports CN but the other
doesn't?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN
Would it be possible to turn on comfort noise generation in FS for the
side which cannot handle CN?
| When on side does not support CN, FS simply won't forward CN RTP
packets. Comfort noise generation into media channel in FS is possible with
bridge_generate_comfort_noise=true
added in r9543. More about on http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
Quote: | 5. Is it possible to let FS detect silence and on one leg send CN
packets insted of RTP?
E.g. softphone->FS->GW (sends CN packets)
the softphone does not support CN, but for saving bandwidth it would be
good to have silence detection and in case of silence FS lets send CN
instead of RTP.
| Yes, possible. VAD has to be turned on that channel and both sides have
to agree on CN RTP packets (in SDP).
Quote: | Sorry for my dump questions, I would like to understand the whole picture.
| I hope I'm on the right way
Quote: | I would like to add the clarification to FS wiki to lets other have less
troubles (with endpoints on one side supporting VAD/CNG and endpoints on
other side not supporting VAD/CNG, e.g. CallWeaver)
| Check
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/VAD_and_CNG
Quote: | Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Tamas
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
james.green at stealth... Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:47 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question |
|
|
Michael Jerris wrote:
Indeed. Two questions:
1) Does VAD apply fully, partially or not at all when it comes to
on-hold music containing vocals?
2) Are you avoiding or are we include references to external sites
documentating matters? Example in case: Shouldn't "Voice Activity
Detection" be a link to the Wikipedia page on the matter, for further
reading? Perhaps external references to the bottom of the page? Can't
find a decision on this if one has been made.
James
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveu at coppice.org Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:00 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] VAD and CN question |
|
|
James Green wrote:
Quote: | Michael Jerris wrote:
Indeed. Two questions:
1) Does VAD apply fully, partially or not at all when it comes to
on-hold music containing vocals?
2) Are you avoiding or are we include references to external sites
documentating matters? Example in case: Shouldn't "Voice Activity
Detection" be a link to the Wikipedia page on the matter, for further
reading? Perhaps external references to the bottom of the page? Can't
find a decision on this if one has been made.
| The last time I looked Wikipedia had a completely useless page for VAD.
It looks like they have now replaced it with a perfectly reasonable page.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|