VoIP Mailing List Archives

[anthony.minessale at g...]

you could make up a uuid just for the conference name in the original call

<action application="export" data="my_conf_id=${create_uuid()}"/>

Now this channel and any other channel created by this channel will inherit this var


On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Carole O. <carole.olivier@enst.fr (carole.olivier@enst.fr)> wrote:

[freeswitch-users at li...]

On 12/17/2008 7:34 AM, Carole O. wrote:

[freeswitch-users at li...]

On 12/17/2008 8:24 AM, Carole O. wrote:

[carole.olivier at enst.fr]

It would be unique you are right but I am not sure I can get its value if A
puts the call on hold, calls C and wants to add it to the conference whose
name dependent of the uuid of another session.
I think if I use ${uuid} to add C I will have the uuid of the session
between A and C and not A and B no?
And I really have to configure this from the dialplan so statically.

Am I wrong somewhere??

Carole


Rupa Schomaker (lists)-2 wrote:

[carole.olivier at enst.fr]

Hello,

Thanks for your answers!
Concerning the creation of a new variable for the conference the problem is
that I do not create channels from the conference. I call separately a new
member on a new channel and add it on the conference only if he agrees to
enter it. So it was the same problem as for the uuid, I am not sure I can
access the good variable from anywhere in case many conferences are running.

So, I do the following if somebody is interested in:

<extension name="Local_Extension">
.....................
<condition field="destination_number"
expression="^${caller_id_number}$">
<anti-action application="bind_meta_app" data="1 a o transfer::
transf_opp_leg_${db(select/conference/${caller_id_number})}_${destination_number}"/>
<anti-action application="bind_meta_app" data="2 ab s
transfer::-both
transf_both_${uuid}_${caller_id_number}_${destination_number}"/>
..........
</extension>

<extension name="transf_both_legs">
<condition field="destination_number"
expression="^transf_both_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)$">
<action application="db" data="insert/conference/$2/conf_$1"/>
<action application="db" data="insert/conference/$3/conf_$1"/>
<action application="answer"/>
<action application="conference" data="conf_$1@conf_dynamic"/>
</condition>
</extension>

<extension name="transf_opposite_leg">
<condition field="destination_number"
expression="^transf_opp_leg_(.*)_(.*)$">
<action application="db" data="insert/conference/$2/$1"/>
<action application="answer"/>
<action application="conference" data="$1@conf_dynamic"/>
</condition>
</extension>

This is not perfect and I am not sure it is "cleanly" programmed but it
works and it is flexible. All the members in the conference can invite new
members thanks to the conference name they all have in the database.

If you still have critics they are all welcome!
Thanks for your help,
Best regards,
Carole


Rupa Schomaker (lists)-2 wrote:

[fidibus83 at aol.com]

Hello,

Carole, your conference-programm is what I looked for. It's great. I try it.
But I get an Error, when I press *1 and I don't know what it mean... Have
you an idea?

[ERR] mod_conference.c:4849 conference_new() invalid Record! No name.
[CRIT] mod_conference.c:4314 conference_function() Memory Error!

Thanks!

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Carole
O.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008 10:38
An: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] dynamic conference


Hello,

Thanks for your answers!
Concerning the creation of a new variable for the conference the problem is
that I do not create channels from the conference. I call separately a new
member on a new channel and add it on the conference only if he agrees to
enter it. So it was the same problem as for the uuid, I am not sure I can
access the good variable from anywhere in case many conferences are running.

So, I do the following if somebody is interested in:

<extension name="Local_Extension">
.....................
<condition field="destination_number"
expression="^${caller_id_number}$">
<anti-action application="bind_meta_app" data="1 a o transfer::
transf_opp_leg_${db(select/conference/${caller_id_number})}_${destination_nu
mber}"/>
<anti-action application="bind_meta_app" data="2 ab s
transfer::-both
transf_both_${uuid}_${caller_id_number}_${destination_number}"/>
..........
</extension>

<extension name="transf_both_legs">
<condition field="destination_number"
expression="^transf_both_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)$">
<action application="db" data="insert/conference/$2/conf_$1"/>
<action application="db" data="insert/conference/$3/conf_$1"/>
<action application="answer"/>
<action application="conference" data="conf_$1@conf_dynamic"/>
</condition>
</extension>

<extension name="transf_opposite_leg">
<condition field="destination_number"
expression="^transf_opp_leg_(.*)_(.*)$">
<action application="db" data="insert/conference/$2/$1"/>
<action application="answer"/>
<action application="conference" data="$1@conf_dynamic"/>
</condition>
</extension>

This is not perfect and I am not sure it is "cleanly" programmed but it
works and it is flexible. All the members in the conference can invite new
members thanks to the conference name they all have in the database.

If you still have critics they are all welcome!
Thanks for your help,
Best regards,
Carole


Rupa Schomaker (lists)-2 wrote:

[intralanman at freeswi...]

Carole O. wrote:

[carole.olivier at enst.fr]

Hello,

Ray, thanks for your detailed answer!!

Fidibus83, when are you pressing *1 ? Because the last version of the
program I gave is thought to be executed like the following:
- A and B are on call
- A and B decide to change their call into a conference in order to invite
other people. So A or B press first *2. In this way, both legs are
transferred to the extension named transf_both_legs. In this extension, the
name of the conference will be created and added in the database so you can
not skip it.
- A and B are now in a conference
- A (or B) puts B (or A) on hold.
- A (or B) calls C.
- if C answers and agrees then A (or B) press *1. This transfers the
opposite leg, this means C, to the extension transf_opposite_leg. C will be
here transferred to the conference whose name will also be added in the db
as an entry for C.
- A (or B) comes back to the conference it had put on hold.
- A, B and C are now all in the conference.

So I am not sure but maybe you press first *1 instead of *2 isn't?
If this is not the case then you could press F8 to debug and find out what's
wrong. I am sorry but I can not help you more, I am new with freeswitch and
not very experienced.

Thanks to all of you for your help,
I am going to improve this small program,
Best regards,
Carole


Raymond Chandler-2 wrote: