VoIP Mailing List Archives

[pmhshz at gmail.com]

My setup of the system is like:
When calls come from Originator gateway I route the call to Terminator
Gateway based on database lookup.
FS works as switching platform.

In previous setup using JavaScript, JavaScript caused the performance
bottleneck when call traffic increases.
Now I am testing xml_curl so asking for any suggestion, if some one has
experienced...



shehzad p wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

it all depends on what you're doing.. can you elaborate?

/b

On Feb 20, 2009, at 4:18 AM, shehzad p wrote:

[pmhshz at gmail.com]

Hi Brian,

My setup is to use FS as basic calls routing.
1. Calls are coming to FS from more than one customer Gateways, and I need
to authenticate them and check for enough balance based on database,
[Caller Gateways] ===> [FreeSWITCH] ===>
[Provider Gateways]
2. After knowing that Caller Gateways is valid, then based on dialed number
it search in database for Provider Gateway and bridge the call there.
3. After call finish CDR is inserted back into database.

My old setup was using Javascript which works fine in traffic of 10 to 20
calls, but then increase of traffic causes many problems.

Now I eliminate use of any of the script (javascript or any other) for call
routing, and route calls directly from dialplan,
So I have setup test system using xml-curl to generate dynamic dialplan,
I used below xml_curl PHP example as reference:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_xml_curl_PHP_example
For CDR processing I used xml_cdr, with help of the example in FS source
:scripts/contrib/trixter/xml-cdr.


Waiting for any better suggestions, any comments...

thanks
msp.

Brian West-3 wrote:

[shannon at sacredheart...]

I'd recommend having a look at fastcgi as well.

On 2/21/09, shehzad p <pmhshz@gmail.com> wrote:

[freeswitch at serverco...]

Is this a good application for the new ESL (Event Socket Library)interface?

-anm



On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Shannon <shannon@sacredhearts.us> wrote:

[pmhshz at gmail.com]

Thanks for your response,
I am studying FastCGI as Shannon recommend.

Is there any other possibility of making this setup better,
OR making it better requires change in architecture, If yes please anybody
comment and point me out to that direction.

Thanks
msp


Shannon-27 wrote: