VoIP Mailing List Archives

[saigop at gmail.com]

Hi,

   I saw the apache portable runtime is included in freeswitch. So far I understand that using APR will give good performance. Am I correct? or it has been used for some other scenarios like even socket or dialplan? 
--
Thank you  with regards,
Gopal,

[mike at jerris.com]

apr is used primarily for portability and utility, not performance.
It is used heavily throughout the entire codebase in the core and all
modules (via our abstraction layer).

On May 28, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Gopalakrishnan A.N wrote:

[saigop at gmail.com]

Ok Thanks Mike.

I hope in asterisk it is not there. I was trying some couple of things, 


1. when I use Java servlet to dial a call thru asterisk using manager interface it slows down.


2. when I use the same Java servlet with Freeswitch I feel the speed and usage in the tomcat. Its bit faster for simultaneous call. whereas in Asterisk I am not able to see the speed.

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com (mike@jerris.com)> wrote:

[anthony.minessale at g...]

There is a very long explanation as to the differences behind asterisk AMI and FreeSWITCH Event Socket that I will not get into now
but it's not related to APR or TCP socket performance whatsoever it's more about asynchronous versus monolithic modeling.
 

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Gopalakrishnan A.N <saigop@gmail.com (saigop@gmail.com)> wrote: