VoIP Mailing List Archives

[Prometheus001 at gmx.net]

Hello,

anybody has a clue what this message means?
[WARNING] ozmod_libpri.c:729 VETO Changing state on 1:1 from
PROGRESS_MEDIA to PROGRESS
What does VETO mean here?

Best regards
Peter

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[moises.silva at gmail.com]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Peter P GMX <Prometheus001@gmx.net (Prometheus001@gmx.net)> wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

Isn't progress_media already past progress in the state machine? so the state machine can't move backwards in states right?

/b

On Aug 12, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Moises Silva wrote:

[moises.silva at gmail.com]

Correct, so the question is why ozmod_libpri attempting to move from progress_media to progress ... may be a delayed libpri event? or some crap along those lines. 

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org (brian@freeswitch.org)> wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

Yes you can get a progress after you get a progress with media ... I
have seen it.

/b

On Aug 12, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Moises Silva wrote:

[msc at freeswitch.org]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org (brian@freeswitch.org)> wrote:

[moises.silva at gmail.com]

then probably we should check the current state and ignore the libpri event when already in progress with media.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org (msc@freeswitch.org)> wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

Well you really can't ignore it... it happens with our ISDN stack
too. Thats what the VETO handles.

/b

On Aug 12, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Moises Silva wrote:

[moises.silva at gmail.com]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org (brian@freeswitch.org)> wrote:

[mrene_lists at avgs.ca]

It probably just VETO it so it avoid sending SWITCH_MESSAGE_INDICATE_PROGRESS again since the call is already making progress from the core's point of view?
Mathieu Rene
Avant-Garde Solutions Inc
Office: + 1 (514) 664-1044 x100
Cell: +1 (514) 664-1044 x200
mrene@avgs.ca (mrene@avgs.ca)








On 13-Aug-09, at 11:02 AM, Moises Silva wrote:

[moises.silva at gmail.com]

Yes, agreed, but there is no point in sending a WARNING since is a normal condition, therefore should not even try to change the state of the channel.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Mathieu Rene <mrene_lists@avgs.ca (mrene_lists@avgs.ca)> wrote:

[mike at jerris.com]

Issue is we don't handle progress and progress media differently, maybe we should. The message is however harmless, but annoying and should probably be dealt with a bit better. Patches welcome.

Mike

On Aug 13, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Moises Silva wrote: