Sponsor: VoiceMeUp - Corporate & Wholesale VoIP Services

VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community
 SearchSearch 

[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch on embedded device: interesting or not?


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VoIP Mailing List Archives Forum Index -> freeSWITCH Users
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Claudio.Cavalera at it...
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:51 am    Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch on embedded device: interestin Reply with quote

Hello guys,
lately I've been trying to compile Freeswitch for a MIPS architecture.
With the help of the community I've understood that my target
architecture was wrong because of limitations in the SDK toolchain's.
I'm not writing now to get help but to start (I hope) a discussion.
I would like to understand your points of view about the general idea of
porting FS on embedded devices.
I'm not hardware expert at all; someone says that porting FS to any
appliance which is not x86 based is a loss of time, because ARM and MIPS
processors just lack computational power, this could be true, but maybe
it depends on what you expect FS to do on such an embedded architecture.
We are now all used to the amazing performance of FS on multicores 64bit
cpus but still the one line description of FS is:
"FreeSWITCH is an open source telephony platform designed to facilitate
the creation of voice and chat driven products scaling from a soft-phone
up to a soft-switch".
Therefore a scaled down FS could be done, do you think is interesting?
I'm not speaking here from a technical point of view, I know others have
already compiled FS for ARM and MIPS and their experience is on the
wiki.
Would you consider a scaled down FS only for x86 architectures (e.g. the
pfSense package or Atom)?

Regards,
Claudio


Internet Email Confidentiality Footer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
La presente comunicazione, con le informazioni in essa contenute e ogni documento o file allegato, e' rivolta unicamente alla/e persona/e cui e' indirizzata ed alle altre da questa autorizzata/e a riceverla. Se non siete i destinatari/autorizzati siete avvisati che qualsiasi azione, copia, comunicazione, divulgazione o simili basate sul contenuto di tali informazioni e' vietata e potrebbe essere contro la legge (art. 616 C.P., D.Lgs n. 196/2003 Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali). Se avete ricevuto questa comunicazione per errore, vi preghiamo di darne immediata notizia al mittente e di distruggere il messaggio originale e ogni file allegato senza farne copia alcuna o riprodurne in alcun modo il contenuto.

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and are confidential and/or may contain legally privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake or are not one of the addressees above, you may take no action based on it, and you may not copy or show it to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and point out the error which has occurred.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Back to top
mike at jerris.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:49 pm    Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch on embedded device: interestin Reply with quote

I know of at least one person who has had good luck with small
applications on arm, in fact there are good working instructions for
how to cross for arm on the wiki that are known to work.

Mike

On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Cavalera Claudio Luigi wrote:

Quote:
Hello guys,
lately I've been trying to compile Freeswitch for a MIPS architecture.
With the help of the community I've understood that my target
architecture was wrong because of limitations in the SDK toolchain's.
I'm not writing now to get help but to start (I hope) a discussion.
I would like to understand your points of view about the general
idea of
porting FS on embedded devices.
I'm not hardware expert at all; someone says that porting FS to any
appliance which is not x86 based is a loss of time, because ARM and
MIPS
processors just lack computational power, this could be true, but
maybe
it depends on what you expect FS to do on such an embedded
architecture.
We are now all used to the amazing performance of FS on multicores
64bit
cpus but still the one line description of FS is:
"FreeSWITCH is an open source telephony platform designed to
facilitate
the creation of voice and chat driven products scaling from a soft-
phone
up to a soft-switch".
Therefore a scaled down FS could be done, do you think is interesting?
I'm not speaking here from a technical point of view, I know others
have
already compiled FS for ARM and MIPS and their experience is on the
wiki.
Would you consider a scaled down FS only for x86 architectures (e.g.
the
pfSense package or Atom)?

Regards,
Claudio



_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VoIP Mailing List Archives Forum Index -> freeSWITCH Users All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

VoiceMeUp - Corporate & Wholesale VoIP Services