VoIP Mailing List Archives

[miles.chet at gmail.com]

sub-domain seem to be a very wise choice...
ptbr



On Oct 17, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

I'm with Anthony, the sub-domain idea is nice, I wish we could find a way to do internalization in our wiki in a easy/elegantly way.

Diego

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com (anthony.minessale@gmail.com)> wrote:

[mike at jerris.com]

I think we strongly lean towards using a sub-domain (if necessary) and
maintaining other language content in the same wiki in alternate
pages. If the wiki software we are using is not effective to create
multiple languages we should find a way to do it all in one. We can
set up an additional mailing list if necessary but also we have no
issue with going across multiple languages in both the mailing list
and in irc.

Mike

On Oct 17, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Roberto Martins wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

If we find a better wiki software that does internalization in a better way, I could help porting the documentation over to the new software.

The sub-domain idea is also very nice.

Diego


On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com (mike@jerris.com)> wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

Would you be open to test another wiki software, that supports internalization/translation easier, if i am open to port the entire documentation to the new wiki software?




On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com (diego.viola@gmail.com)> wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

Some interesting pages on the subject.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software
http://www.osnews.com/story/21865/Recommend_an_Open_Source_Wiki_Platform



On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com (diego.viola@gmail.com)> wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

We could also do this for a better documentation.

1. Pick a new wiki engine that does internalization/translation easier.
2. Set some documentation guidelines from the start.
3. Move stuff over to the new wiki.
4. Start with the translation/internalization on the new wiki.

Diego

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com (diego.viola@gmail.com)> wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

Instead of adding million of different domains for the languages, it would be nice if we only keep wiki.freeswitch.org, and the wiki software provides a list of languages to choose from.

Then when we click in one of the languages we have the wiki translated to the desired language.

I believe if we go this way we will be more organized, and there is more chances that things will get translated, and we wont be repeating too much information here and there too.

Just a thought... I'm open to do this work to make it happen.

The different domains per language is a good idea too.

Diego

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com (diego.viola@gmail.com)> wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

Take a look at this for instance:

http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/start

This uses DokuWiki, check the langauges option at the top (en, de, el, es, fr, etc) and when you click one of them it translates the actual page to the desired language... I'd love to have something like that.

Diego

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com (diego.viola@gmail.com)> wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

With sub-domains you'll need to start all over and it will be a pain to keep the documentation in-sync.

With a wiki that supports real translation it's easier to add a new line with the translation tag or whatever.

Diego

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com (diego.viola@gmail.com)> wrote:

[diego.viola at gmail.com]

http://moinmo.in/ is also pretty cool it seems and it's used for the apache wiki and others.

http://wiki.apache.org/

It also has i18n support, full text search, etc.

Diego

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com (diego.viola@gmail.com)> wrote:

[miles.chet at gmail.com]

what about http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/ they give
free licenses to open source project, and FS is using JIRA.

roberto

On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Diego Viola wrote:

[mike at jerris.com]

we do have a license for this, people didn't seem to like it last time
we looked at it, I can't recall why.

On Oct 19, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Roberto Martins wrote:

[raffaele.p.guidi at gm...]

+1 for Confluence 

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 00:55, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com (mike@jerris.com)> wrote: