VoIP Mailing List Archives

[ujjval at simplesignal...]

With the following spec for CPU and Memory can someone help me guesstimating how many simultaneous calls and Calls/sec a FS server can handle - Used as a Conferencing Server.

cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 2800.386
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips : 5604.12

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 2800.386
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips : 5600.22


# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1035080 kB
MemFree: 517972 kB
Buffers: 85812 kB
Cached: 271264 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 224292 kB
Inactive: 223008 kB
HighTotal: 130816 kB
HighFree: 29484 kB
LowTotal: 904264 kB
LowFree: 488488 kB
SwapTotal: 2031608 kB
SwapFree: 2031520 kB
Dirty: 80 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 90172 kB
Mapped: 39880 kB
Slab: 60060 kB
PageTables: 3232 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 2549148 kB
Committed_AS: 345780 kB
VmallocTotal: 114680 kB
VmallocUsed: 3584 kB
VmallocChunk: 110888 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
Hugepagesize: 4096 kB
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[brian at freeswitch.org]

You'll have to do your own load testing. Nobody can really tell you
exactly how many you'll get.

/b

On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Ujjval Karihaloo wrote:

[ujjval at simplesignal...]

Are there any benchmarking test results available publicly?
________________________________________
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian West [brian@freeswitch.org]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:18 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity

You'll have to do your own load testing. Nobody can really tell you
exactly how many you'll get.

/b

On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Ujjval Karihaloo wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

I highly doubt it... You can wait for someone to post their results
but in the end you'll have to do your own load testing because not
everyone's numbers will jive with your use case. Which is the reason
the project never posts or endorses a set call count.

/b

On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo wrote:

[vinuth.madinur at gmai...]

Here are a few benchmarks that I had stumbled upon.

http://wiki.voiceworks.pl/display/~pawel/FreeSwitch+performance+on+SUN+x2200+M2


[/url]Thanks,
Vinuth.


On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org (brian@freeswitch.org)> wrote:

[gmaruzz at celliax.org]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Vinuth Madinur
<vinuth.madinur@gmail.com> wrote:

[egable+freeswitch at g...]

Although, FYI, I just benchmarked mod_xml_curl on a separate web app
server from FS with FS on a Dell R710 with their current best
processor option (Intel Xeon X5570 @2.93GHz with 8-cores total) and 32
GB memory. The web app server is less than half the power of the R710.
I maxed the web app server at 300 calls per second (both setting up
and tearing down) and the R710 running FS was 65% idle. No audio was
being proxied through FS, though. If I were running the web app server
on an equivalent R710, they probably would have been on-par with each
other in performance. Extrapolating, I expect that in such a case I
should be able to get at least 650 CPS out of FS, though for
production I would probably limit it to 400 CPS or less so I leave
room for miscellaneous tasks. I maxed out the R710 at over 16,000
simultaneous calls (again, no audio proxying) but the only reason I
couldn't do more was because I hit some sort of thread creation limit
in Linux. There was about 17 GB of memory used for this many calls.
This should give you some ballpark idea of what you can accomplish
with FS.

At some point, I will track down and resolve the thread creation
issue, at which time I believe call limits will be limited either by a
complex combination of available memory, the speed of the processor,
the cost of thread context switching, calls per second setup rate, and
call duration.

--
Eliot Gable

[anthony.minessale at g...]

i wonder if we can at least get a taco-bell steak burrito for that if we can't win the s-prize
 

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch@gmail.com ([email]egable%2Bfreeswitch@gmail.com[/email])> wrote:

[msc at freeswitch.org]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com (anthony.minessale@gmail.com)> wrote:

[brian at freeswitch.org]

yo quiero taco bell

/b

On Oct 26, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Michael Collins wrote:

[red.rain.seven at gmai...]

ah..... do you have to mention about taco bell that now I have moved away from US. ~~~drooling~~~ 

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org (brian@freeswitch.org)> wrote:

[cliff at develix.com]

A little off-topic, but since call-capacity is the subject, what are
people using to analyze their CDR's to discover this? I'm handling
about 30k calls per day but have only a bandwidth-based guesstimate of
the peak number of concurrent calls I'm handling.

If there's an open source solution, I'd appreciate a pointer.

Regards,
Cliff

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:01 -0400, Eliot Gable wrote:

[damin at nacs.net]

I'm fond of Vqmanager from ManagEngine. It is a passive SIP monitor. I.E.
you mirror the ports that your FS or Asterisk boxes, and VQmanager sniffs
the mirrors, tracking all sorts of good data.

You can install it on a Centos box, and get a free trial.

http://www.manageengine.com/products/vqmanager/index.html

What is really cool is that it actually monitors the RTP/RTCP as well as all
of the SIP headers and archives the calls, so you can look at calls from
several days ago and see EXACTLY what happened on them. I have used this
extensively to pinpoint bad Level 3 and X/O media gateways.. Much better
than trying to sniff packets in real-time and MAYBE catch a problem..

I've also used it to find/fix several SIP issues w/ odd endpoints.. Very
easy to see..

[sicfslist at gmail.com]

Cliff,

Try using xml_rpc ... status or show channels will give you what you need.

SDR

Cliff Wells wrote:

[cliff at develix.com]

That's really nice looking software. Thanks for the pointer.

Cliff


On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 16:06 -0400, Gregory Boehnlein wrote: