View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kkielhofner at star2st... Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kkielhofner at star2st... Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:40 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to replicate include =>? |
|
|
On 10/20/08, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Quote: | Could you post a sample from an Asterisk dialplan and maybe we can come up
with a good way to replicate it in FS? Possibly there is a more elegant
solution that does not require lots of munging.
-MC
|
Sure:
[include]
exten => 727,1,DoStuff
exten => 800,1,DoOtherStuff
[default]
include => include
I know it's a simple case and not really an "example" but I'm really
just looking for a way for a context to just "plow through" another
context looking for a match before it returns "No Route" and aborts.
Not exactly elegant but sometimes it's just got to be done (I guess).
It looks like that's what transfer is supposed to do... Is there
any way for me to just remove a condition on the match in [default]
and then just run through another context as defined by my args to
transfer before returning no route? It would be nice to be able to do
multiple "includes" like so:
<extension name="include" continue="true">
<action application="transfer" data="${dialed_ext} XML include"/>
</extension>
<extension name="include2" continue="true">
<action application="transfer" data="${dialed_ext} XML include2"/>
</extension>
I know it's ugly...
--
Kristian Kielhofner
http://blog.krisk.org
http://www.submityoursip.com
http://www.astlinux.org
http://www.star2star.com
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mcollins at fcnetwork.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to replicate include =>? |
|
|
Quote: | Sure:
[include]
exten => 727,1,DoStuff
exten => 800,1,DoOtherStuff
[default]
include => include
I know it's a simple case and not really an "example" but I'm really
just looking for a way for a context to just "plow through" another
context looking for a match before it returns "No Route" and aborts.
Not exactly elegant but sometimes it's just got to be done (I guess).
|
Curious - why exactly must it some times be done? That is, what
scenarios? The reason I ask is that the devs are pretty clever and have
anticipated just about any scenario. My guess is that there's an elegant
solution without stacking a bunch of includes, but I think we'd need to
hear about specific scenarios.
Thoughts?
-MC
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
Quote: | http://www.freeswitch.org
|
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
msc at freeswitch.org Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:43 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to replicate include =>? |
|
|
Could you post a sample from an Asterisk dialplan and maybe we can come up with a good way to replicate it in FS? Possibly there is a more elegant solution that does not require lots of munging.
-MC
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <kkielhofner@star2star.com (kkielhofner@star2star.com)> wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike at jerris.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to replicate include =>? |
|
|
you can just as the last exten in your context do a transfer to the
other context.
Mike
On Oct 20, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Michael Collins wrote:
Quote: | Quote: | Sure:
[include]
exten => 727,1,DoStuff
exten => 800,1,DoOtherStuff
[default]
include => include
I know it's a simple case and not really an "example" but I'm really
just looking for a way for a context to just "plow through" another
context looking for a match before it returns "No Route" and aborts.
Not exactly elegant but sometimes it's just got to be done (I guess).
|
Curious - why exactly must it some times be done? That is, what
scenarios? The reason I ask is that the devs are pretty clever and
have
anticipated just about any scenario. My guess is that there's an
elegant
solution without stacking a bunch of includes, but I think we'd need
to
hear about specific scenarios.
Thoughts?
-MC
Quote: | It looks like that's what transfer is supposed to do... Is there
any way for me to just remove a condition on the match in [default]
and then just run through another context as defined by my args to
transfer before returning no route? It would be nice to be able to
do
multiple "includes" like so:
<extension name="include" continue="true">
<action application="transfer" data="${dialed_ext} XML include"/>
</extension>
<extension name="include2" continue="true">
<action application="transfer" data="${dialed_ext} XML include2"/>
</extension>
I know it's ugly...
|
|
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthony.minessale at g... Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to replicate include =>? |
|
|
One important thing to remember is that in FreeSWITCH the dialplan is a separate stage of a call.
FS parses your dialplan in one pass and builds a "todo" list and then it hits execute state and really does the stuff.
We do have an application called execute_extension that lets you run a dialplan module from the execute state just for the purpose of executing the instruction set from a certian extension so you could use that for what you want like so:
<!--- put this extension last -->
<extension name="include" continue="true">
<!-- conditions with no expression are instantly true -->
<condition>
<action application="execute_extension" data="${dialed_ext} XML include"/>
<action application="execute_extension" data="${dialed_ext} XML include2"/>
<condition/>
</extension>
This would actually cause you to run through both contexts in this order during EXECUTE state.
were the transfer app actually stops the EXECUTE by sending the channel back to RINGING and
re-entering the dialplan stage.
Your best bet is to try to shift the paragidm in your head away from how asterisk does it =D
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <kkielhofner@star2star.com (kkielhofner@star2star.com)> wrote:
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com ([email]MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com[/email])
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com ([email]PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com[/email])
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org ([email]sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org[/email])
iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org ([email]googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org[/email])
pstn:213-799-1400 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kkielhofner at star2st... Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:27 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to replicate include =>? |
|
|
On 10/20/08, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: | One important thing to remember is that in FreeSWITCH the dialplan is a
separate stage of a call.
FS parses your dialplan in one pass and builds a "todo" list and then it
hits execute state and really does the stuff.
We do have an application called execute_extension that lets you run a
dialplan module from the execute state just for the purpose of executing the
instruction set from a certian extension so you could use that for what you
want like so:
<!--- put this extension last -->
<extension name="include" continue="true">
<!-- conditions with no expression are instantly true -->
<condition>
<action application="execute_extension"
data="${dialed_ext} XML include"/>
<action application="execute_extension"
data="${dialed_ext} XML include2"/>
<condition/>
</extension>
This would actually cause you to run through both contexts in this order
during EXECUTE state.
were the transfer app actually stops the EXECUTE by sending the channel back
to RINGING and
re-entering the dialplan stage.
Your best bet is to try to shift the paragidm in your head away from how
asterisk does it =D
|
I know... ATM the moment I'm trying to bring FS into the organization
in stages, "parallel" to Asterisk as much as possible. Once I get
through this initial phase I can begin to think about how to do things
the "FreeSWITCH way" (and do all of the cool stuff I think I'll be
able to do). First things first, though - replicate existing
functionality and make as painless as possible!
--
Kristian Kielhofner
http://blog.krisk.org
http://www.submityoursip.com
http://www.astlinux.org
http://www.star2star.com
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mcollins at fcnetwork.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:29 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to replicate include =>? |
|
|
Quote: | Quote: | Your best bet is to try to shift the paragidm in your head away from
|
| how
Quote: | Quote: | asterisk does it =D
|
I know... ATM the moment I'm trying to bring FS into the organization
in stages, "parallel" to Asterisk as much as possible. Once I get
through this initial phase I can begin to think about how to do things
the "FreeSWITCH way" (and do all of the cool stuff I think I'll be
able to do). First things first, though - replicate existing
functionality and make as painless as possible!
|
That makes sense. Some of Asterisk configs are, by definition, nasty
hacks and kludges. You can do that with FS if you really want to - or
need to. Hopefully you will be able to migrate past the kludge factor in
due time.
-MC
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|