View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
grzegorz.garlewicz at ... Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:55 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio |
|
|
There is a serious bug in Sangoma transcoding cards. The card has an internal, small jitter buffer and it drops samples
from the audio stream when there is high jitter in the network. The bandwidth is cheap now so for me the only reason
to use transcoding is where I have low-bandwidth-high-jitter links. Sangoma said they will not fix it and we had to go back
to software transconding.
Do you have any experience with using Digium cards in such scenario? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EWieling at nyigc.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:42 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio |
|
|
Are you getting errors like this?
[Nov 22 10:39:36] WARNING[6307][C-000009a1]: codec_sangoma.c:969 sangoma_frameout: [2724][ulawtog729] Got Seq 7400 but expecting 2154 (time since last read = 0ms), dropped 5246 packets
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Garlewicz
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 2:55 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio samples
There is a serious bug in Sangoma transcoding cards. The card has an internal, small jitter buffer and it drops samples
from the audio stream when there is high jitter in the network. The bandwidth is cheap now so for me the only reason
to use transcoding is where I have low-bandwidth-high-jitter links. Sangoma said they will not fix it and we had to go back
to software transconding.
Do you have any experience with using Digium cards in such scenario? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gopalakrishnan.an at g... Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:51 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio |
|
|
If you are getting like this dropped packets then nothing to worry.. thisis just an cli message.... in my case I face this but there is no voice delay in actual call. On 22 Nov 2013 21:11, "Eric Wieling" <EWieling@nyigc.com (EWieling@nyigc.com)> wrote: Quote: |
Are you getting errors like this?
[Nov 22 10:39:36] WARNING[6307][C-000009a1]: codec_sangoma.c:969 sangoma_frameout: [2724][ulawtog729] Got Seq 7400 but expecting 2154 (time since last read = 0ms), dropped 5246 packets
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Garlewicz
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 2:55 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users@lists.digium.com)
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio samples
There is a serious bug in Sangoma transcoding cards. The card has an internal, small jitter buffer and it drops samples
from the audio stream when there is high jitter in the network. The bandwidth is cheap now so for me the only reason
to use transcoding is where I have low-bandwidth-high-jitter links. Sangoma said they will not fix it and we had to go back
to software transconding.
Do you have any experience with using Digium cards in such scenario?
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
grzegorz.garlewicz at ... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:40 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Sangoma transcoding card bug - drops audio |
|
|
No, there are no visible errors. We performed several simulation tests in our lab to debug the problem. Every time there was jitter in the simulated network the card was dropping audio samples and the voice was illegible.
I am wondering if anyone tested Digium in such conditions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|