| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mgraves at mstvp.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
 |
|
| Quote: | I wonder why more vendors haven't adopted IAX yet?
|
I expect that before major players adopt this protocol it'd need to be
confirmed as a standard by some form of international body. That was
underway, but lacking anyone to push the process along.
I would've thought that Digium would be the most likely lead proponent,
but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Michael
--
Michael Graves
mgraves<at>mstvp.com
http://blog.mgraves.org
o713-861-4005
c713-201-1262
sip:mjgraves at pixelpower.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
54245 at fwd.pulver.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsmith at digium.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:18 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
|
|
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 13:45 -0500, Michael Graves wrote:
| Quote: | I would've thought that Digium would be the most likely lead proponent,
but that doesn't seem to be the case.
|
Actually, Digium has been quite active in helping to try to get the IAX
protocol adopted as a standard. See
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-guy-iax-04.txt for the latest draft of
the protocol specification as submitted to the IETF.
--
Jared Smith
Training Manager
Digium, Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oej at edvina.net
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:45 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
|
|
5 jun 2008 kl. 20.45 skrev Michael Graves:
| Quote: | | Quote: | I wonder why more vendors haven't adopted IAX yet?
|
I expect that before major players adopt this protocol it'd need to be
confirmed as a standard by some form of international body. That was
underway, but lacking anyone to push the process along.
|
Please note that the IAX draft is just an informational RFC, not
anything that goes any IETF standards track or is endorsed by
the IETF.
There are many vendor-related protocols documented like that.
(Said from the chan_sip corner).
Cheers,
/Olle |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lists at wildgooses.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
|
|
Brent Davidson wrote:
| Quote: | I really like these Snom 300 phones as far as audio quality goes. I
wish they had a few more programmable buttons but that was a
purchasing oversight. We underestimated the number of programmable
buttons we would need and opted for the 300 instead of the 360.
|
When I pushed some vendors for prices there was only a tiny gap between
the 300 and 360. Would suggest looking hard at the 360 always...
Ed W |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lists at minotaur.cc
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:55 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
|
|
| Quote: | When I pushed some vendors for prices there was only a tiny gap between
the 300 and 360. Would suggest looking hard at the 360 always...
|
Interesting... here in the UK the price difference between the 300 and 360 is pretty huge. Either you're getting some stunningly good pricing on 360s or some abysmal pricing on the 300s 
Regards,
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gavin.henry at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:43 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
|
|
What model in the Polycom or Aastra range is the 360 level with?
2008/6/6 Chris Bagnall <lists at minotaur.cc>:
| Quote: | | Quote: | When I pushed some vendors for prices there was only a tiny gap between
the 300 and 360. Would suggest looking hard at the 360 always...
|
Interesting... here in the UK the price difference between the 300 and 360 is pretty huge. Either you're getting some stunningly good pricing on 360s or some abysmal pricing on the 300s
Regards,
Chris
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
--
http://www.suretecsystems.com/services/openldap/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gavin.henry at gmail.com
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stotaro at totarotechn...
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
|
|
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Johansson Olle E <oej at edvina.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
5 jun 2008 kl. 20.45 skrev Michael Graves:
| Quote: | | Quote: | I wonder why more vendors haven't adopted IAX yet?
|
I expect that before major players adopt this protocol it'd need to be
confirmed as a standard by some form of international body. That was
underway, but lacking anyone to push the process along.
|
Please note that the IAX draft is just an informational RFC, not
anything that goes any IETF standards track or is endorsed by
the IETF.
There are many vendor-related protocols documented like that.
(Said from the chan_sip corner).
Cheers,
/Olle
|
I have consulted on so many systems with poor audio, the first thing I
check is IAX or SIP. If IAX, I move over to SIP and the calls are
prefect.
I avoid IAX at all costs, use OpenVPN, open tons of ports on your
firewall, whatever you can do to use SIP. The only time I will use
IAX is if in some remote backwards part of the world, they have
several NATs so it is impossible to control.
Even www.iax.cc recommends using SIP. Overhead is of little concern
with MPLS and big pipes.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
russell at digium.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 vs 1.4? |
|
|
Steve Totaro wrote:
| Quote: | I have consulted on so many systems with poor audio, the first thing I
check is IAX or SIP. If IAX, I move over to SIP and the calls are
prefect.
I avoid IAX at all costs, use OpenVPN, open tons of ports on your
firewall, whatever you can do to use SIP. The only time I will use
IAX is if in some remote backwards part of the world, they have
several NATs so it is impossible to control.
Even www.iax.cc recommends using SIP. Overhead is of little concern
with MPLS and big pipes.
|
I would be interested to hear if you have had any of these problems with
the latest 1.4 versions of Asterisk. A _lot_ of work has gone into IAX2
support in Asterisk 1.4, and specifically, the most recent 25% of the
1.4 series or so.
--
Russell Bryant
Senior Software Engineer
Open Source Team Lead
Digium, Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Search
