VoIP Mailing List Archives

[chris.chen2004 at gmai...]

Jingwei, can you show your console log when somebody is calling you from gtalk client? Will it really hit 888 in your dialplan?
Thanks,
Chris

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Jingwei Yang <jingwei.yang@gmail.com (jingwei.yang@gmail.com)> wrote:

[jingwei.yang at gmail.com]

Hi Chris, I've attached the console logs for your reference. It really hits 888 in the dialplan and the external call can hear the echo without any problem.

One thing attracts me is how the ip addresses are translated. Here's the working external example:

<ses:candidate address="192.168.2.150" port="1726" name="rtp" username="k+TZoLgUQB02PV/C" password="pQ3hz/DzarYnnLhJ" preference="1" protocol="udp" generation="0" network="0" type="local"></ses:candidate>        (external party's local addr)

<ses:candidate address="123.118.149.94" port="45538" name="rtp" username="C5lc0jkpxDBWVRn6" password="u2lw7FbrzmaJJSHq" preference="0.9" protocol="udp" generation="0" network="0" type="stun"></ses:candidate>        (external party's global addr)

<ses:candidate name="rtp" address="59.189.194.244" port="17112" username="PQ0Fmus5M3udzy3G" password="PQ0Fmus5M3udzy3G" preference="1.0" protocol="udp" type="stun" network="0" generation="0"></ses:candidate>        (server's global addr)

Here's the non-working internal exmaple:

<candidate name="rtp" address="192.168.1.101" port="2202" preference="1" username="y6P1CToBaRZpybAl" protocol="udp" generation="0" password="tcrX5Wj426qTa1Cx" type="local" network="0"></candidate>        (internal party's local addr)

<candidate name="rtp" address="59.189.194.244" port="2203" preference="0.9" username="UMuUvr9o66D2myqb" protocol="udp" generation="0" password="vvq4+GUsOYV/On5g" type="stun" network="0"></candidate>        (internal party's global addr)

<ses:candidate name="rtp" address="59.189.194.244" port="30578" username="MeymWgoZwasUm32h" password="MeymWgoZwasUm32h" preference="1.0" protocol="udp" type="stun" network="0" generation="0"></ses:candidate>        (server's global addr)

<candidate name="rtp" address="192.168.1.101" port="2202" preference="1" username="y6P1CToBaRZpybAl" protocol="udp" generation="0" password="tcrX5Wj426qTa1Cx" type="local" network="0"></candidate>        (internal party's local addr, again!)
    <candidate name="rtp" address="59.189.194.244" port="2203" preference="0.9" username="UMuUvr9o66D2myqb" protocol="udp" generation="0" password="vvq4+GUsOYV/On5g" type="stun" network="0"></candidate>        (internal party's global addr)

<candidate name="rtp" address="209.85.201.126" port="19295" preference="0.5" username="91jrUtL10nk9VcrZ" protocol="udp" generation="0" password="9s8fNrseavVslvyZ" type="relay" network="0"></candidate>        (google's global addr)

<candidate name="rtp" address="209.85.201.126" port="19294" preference="0.5" username="91jrUtL10nk9VcrZ" protocol="tcp" generation="0" password="9s8fNrseavVslvyZ" type="relay" network="0"></candidate>        (google's global addr)

<candidate name="rtp" address="192.168.1.101" port="2205" preference="0.8" username="g3/qPdtEdo02zm8Y" protocol="tcp" generation="0" password="WYRbJIk5vcToxsqT" type="local" network="0"></candidate>        (internal party's local addr, 3rd time!)

<candidate name="rtp" address="209.85.201.126" port="443" preference="0.5" username="91jrUtL10nk9VcrZ" protocol="ssltcp" generation="0" password="9s8fNrseavVslvyZ" type="relay" network="0"></candidate>        (google's global addr)


And finally, when the call was hung up, the internal one showed an error like this:

<iq to="yyyyyy@gmail.com/talk930C641A" id="308" type="error" from="xxxxxx@gmail.com/Talk.v1046D90E88C">
  <ses:session type="terminate" id="186547325" initiator="xxxxxx@gmail.com/Talk.v1046D90E88C" xmlns:ses="http://www.google.com/session"></ses:session>
  <error type="modify">
    <sta:bad-request xmlns:sta="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"></sta:bad-request>
    <sta:text xml:lang="en" xmlns:sta="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas">unknown session</sta:text>
  </error>
</iq>

Regards,
-Jingwei

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Chris Chen <chris.chen2004@gmail.com (chris.chen2004@gmail.com)> wrote: