VoIP Mailing List Archives

[christian.loeschenkohl...]

hello

we have got a little problem with the conference application
in our setup we have da system for customers where speakers can dial in
with phonenumber+1 and the listeners dial in with phonenumber

the speakers conference is started with 323963096@conf+flags{waste}
the listeners conference is started with 323963096@conf+flags{mute,waste}

waste is needed to get the whole audio stream
it now happens that listeners sometimes hear each other, that shouldn't be

what can i do to resolve this problem?
we are using version 1.0.4

br

--
Ing. Christian Löschenkohl
Technische Leitung, Forschung & Entwicklung VoIP

xpirio
Telekommunikation & Service GmbH
Lakeside B04
9020 Klagenfurt
Austria

T +43 (0) 5 77 11 - 1000
F +43 (0) 5 77 11 - 1002
E christian.loeschenkohl@xpirio.com

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[bjbrashier at gmail.com]

I haven't really used waste much myself, but my understanding is that
waste and mute would conflict, since waste says "send audio always"
and mute says "send audio never". I didn't understand why you're using
waste on the listeners... you should be able to get by with waste just
on the speaker (again, that's how I understand it).

2009/9/1 Christian Löschenkohl <christian.loeschenkohl@xpirio.com>:

[christian.loeschenkohl...]

thank you for your response

as a listener waste influences what you hear and mute say's you cannot speak
this is what our customer wanted because the speaker is the only one who is
heard in this "conference" or meeting room - this rooms are for lectures

we tried to disable waste for the listeners (and let it on for the speaker) but this
resulted in "choppy" sound for the listeners (silence periods between words and sentences)

i hope i could explain my problem a little bit better

br

On 2009-09-01 23:32, Bradley Brashier wrote:

[anthony.minessale at g...]

waste + mute would result in sending audio that was all zeros or generated silence.


On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Bradley Brashier <bjbrashier@gmail.com (bjbrashier@gmail.com)> wrote:

[anthony.minessale at g...]

that means something in your path does not support CNG/VAD.
it's perfectly ok to use waste and mute together.

there is no chance that you would not enter the conf muted the way you describe unless you are
using an older revision of FS that had a bug in the parsing of the conference flags.


2009/9/1 Christian Löschenkohl <christian.loeschenkohl@xpirio.com (christian.loeschenkohl@xpirio.com)>

[woof at iwoof.org]

Woof!

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:52:01 -0400, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:

[christian.loeschenkohl...]

thank you

but we defined the conference with

<param name="caller-controls " value="none"/>

so no keys should be available

br


On 2009-09-02 17:02, Andy Spitzer wrote: