VoIP Mailing List Archives

[saigop at gmail.com]

Hi
I need to get the channel answer state for particular user. For example there is a GUI for outbound call where the a ajax program will run in the background of the program to get the answer state. after i originate a call from event socket the ajax program will start monitor the line answer state in the events plain CHANNEL_CREATE CHANNEL_ANSWER CHANNEL_HANGUP and also i can able to get the answer state as DIaling / Answered / Hangup by logging in one computer.


In another stage when logging as two different users in two different computer, once the call is originated from the two computers the ajax program starts the monitoring of the answer state line, but what happens when i hangup the call in one computer its showing in all computers as hangup in the answer state since the other computer is in the call.


Is there a api that I can get the channel answer state thru UUID. Is it possible?
--
Thank you with regards,
Gopal,

[anthony.minessale at g...]

the unique-id header in the event tells you the uuid.


On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Gopal krishnan <saigop@gmail.com (saigop@gmail.com)> wrote:

[saigop at gmail.com]

Hi,

Can this would help us

uuid_getvar <uuid> <varname>

like api uuid_getvar <uuid> Answer state:

--
Thank you with regards,
Gopal,

[saigop at gmail.com]

Hi,

I tried like this

api uuid_getvar <uuid> endpoint_disposition but when the far end is ringing its showing as ANSWER in the telnet console since my local extension is answered.

I would like to show the endpoint_disposition for the far end.

my originate command is

api originate sofia/internal/1001%9894929942@172.20.191.228 (9894929942@172.20.191.228))
and moreover cant we use the Answer-State in uuid_getvar?
--
Thank you with regards,
Gopal,

[anthony.minessale at g...]

if you have latest trunk you can test the new beta filter feature I am working on.

try
events all
filter unique-id <some uuid>

now you will only get events matching that uuid.


On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Gopal krishnan <saigop@gmail.com (saigop@gmail.com)> wrote: