VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jonas.kellens at telen... Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:47 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in cert |
|
|
Hello,
I'm using MySQL realtime Call Queues (table queues and table queue_members).
I would like to ring the members of the call queue in a certain order. Therefore I use ring strategy lineair and I put the members into the table queue_members in the order in which they have to be rang.
So I have the queue :
| name | musicclass | announce | context | timeout | monitor_type | monitor_format | queue_youarenext | queue_thereare | queue_callswaiting | queue_holdtime | queue_minutes | queue_seconds | queue_lessthan | queue_thankyou | queue_reporthold | announce_frequency | announce_round_seconds | announce_holdtime | announce_position | retry | wrapuptime | maxlen | servicelevel | strategy | joinempty | leavewhenempty | eventmemberstatus | eventwhencalled | reportholdtime | memberdelay | weight | timeoutrestart | periodic_announce | periodic_announce_frequency | ringinuse |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
| queue6 | default | NULL | | 12 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 30 | NULL | No | yes | 5 | 10 | 0 | NULL | linear | strict | strict | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no | | 0 | no |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
and queue members :
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| 44 | queuemem4 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem4 | 0 | NULL |
| 45 | queuemem2 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem2 | 0 | NULL |
| 46 | queuemem5 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem5 | 0 | NULL |
| 47 | queuemem1 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem1 | 0 | NULL |
| 48 | queuemem10 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem10 | 0 | NULL |
| 49 | queuemem18 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem18 | 0 | NULL |
| 50 | queuemem17 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem17 | 0 | NULL |
| 51 | queuemem12 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem12 | 0 | NULL |
| 52 | queuemem16 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem16 | 0 | NULL |
| 53 | queuemem13 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem13 | 0 | NULL |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
You can see that the member queuemem4 is first in line to be rang (has the first and lowest uniqueid in the table).
But the first member that is being rang, is queuemem1. How come ??
Kind regards,
Jonas. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonas.kellens at telen... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:09 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in cert |
|
|
On 12-02-14 16:58, Steven Wheeler wrote:
Quote: | <![endif]--> <![endif]-->
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:46 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
Hello,
I'm using MySQL realtime Call Queues (table queues and table queue_members).
I would like to ring the members of the call queue in a certain order. Therefore I use ring strategy lineair and I put the members into the table queue_members in the order in which they have to be rang.
So I have the queue :
| name | musicclass | announce | context | timeout | monitor_type | monitor_format | queue_youarenext | queue_thereare | queue_callswaiting | queue_holdtime | queue_minutes | queue_seconds | queue_lessthan | queue_thankyou | queue_reporthold | announce_frequency | announce_round_seconds | announce_holdtime | announce_position | retry | wrapuptime | maxlen | servicelevel | strategy | joinempty | leavewhenempty | eventmemberstatus | eventwhencalled | reportholdtime | memberdelay | weight | timeoutrestart | periodic_announce | periodic_announce_frequency | ringinuse |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
| queue6 | default | NULL | | 12 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 30 | NULL | No | yes | 5 | 10 | 0 | NULL | linear | strict | strict | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no | | 0 | no |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
and queue members :
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| 44 | queuemem4 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem4 | 0 | NULL |
| 45 | queuemem2 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem2 | 0 | NULL |
| 46 | queuemem5 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem5 | 0 | NULL |
| 47 | queuemem1 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem1 | 0 | NULL |
| 48 | queuemem10 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem10 | 0 | NULL |
| 49 | queuemem18 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem18 | 0 | NULL |
| 50 | queuemem17 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem17 | 0 | NULL |
| 51 | queuemem12 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem12 | 0 | NULL |
| 52 | queuemem16 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem16 | 0 | NULL |
| 53 | queuemem13 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem13 | 0 | NULL |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
You can see that the member queuemem4 is first in line to be rang (has the first and lowest uniqueid in the table).
But the first member that is being rang, is queuemem1. How come ??
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
We encountered the same problem. It is a bug in the Queue application. The Queue application actually orders members by their interface value. Here is the bug report I opened https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480 which was closed as "Not A Bug" by Digium. We worked around this by prepending an integer (001__, 002__, …) to the interface in the database table and then removing it later in the dial plan. Hope this helps.
Steven Wheeler
|
Hello,
thank you for your reply.
Is it the "membername" or the "interface" that needs to be sorted to have a certain order in the call queue ?
How do you remove the prefix (integer) from a call queue member from dialplan ?
If you call the queue in your dialplan as follow :
exten => s,n,Queue(${queuename},,,,${timeout})
How can you "edit" its members ??
Kind regards,
Jonas. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SWheeler at usinternet... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 11:37 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in cert |
|
|
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:12 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
On 12-02-14 16:58, Steven Wheeler wrote:
Quote: |
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:46 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
Hello,
I'm using MySQL realtime Call Queues (table queues and table queue_members).
I would like to ring the members of the call queue in a certain order. Therefore I use ring strategy lineair and I put the members into the table queue_members in the order in which they have to be rang.
So I have the queue :
| name | musicclass | announce | context | timeout | monitor_type | monitor_format | queue_youarenext | queue_thereare | queue_callswaiting | queue_holdtime | queue_minutes | queue_seconds | queue_lessthan | queue_thankyou | queue_reporthold | announce_frequency | announce_round_seconds | announce_holdtime | announce_position | retry | wrapuptime | maxlen | servicelevel | strategy | joinempty | leavewhenempty | eventmemberstatus | eventwhencalled | reportholdtime | memberdelay | weight | timeoutrestart | periodic_announce | periodic_announce_frequency | ringinuse |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
| queue6 | default | NULL | | 12 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 30 | NULL | No | yes | 5 | 10 | 0 | NULL | linear | strict | strict | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no | | 0 | no |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
and queue members :
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| 44 | queuemem4 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem4 | 0 | NULL |
| 45 | queuemem2 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem2 | 0 | NULL |
| 46 | queuemem5 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem5 | 0 | NULL |
| 47 | queuemem1 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem1 | 0 | NULL |
| 48 | queuemem10 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem10 | 0 | NULL |
| 49 | queuemem18 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem18 | 0 | NULL |
| 50 | queuemem17 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem17 | 0 | NULL |
| 51 | queuemem12 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem12 | 0 | NULL |
| 52 | queuemem16 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem16 | 0 | NULL |
| 53 | queuemem13 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem13 | 0 | NULL |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
You can see that the member queuemem4 is first in line to be rang (has the first and lowest uniqueid in the table).
But the first member that is being rang, is queuemem1. How come ??
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
We encountered the same problem. It is a bug in the Queue application. The Queue application actually orders members by their interface value. Here is the bug report I opened https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480 which was closed as "Not A Bug" by Digium. We worked around this by prepending an integer (001__, 002__, …) to the interface in the database table and then removing it later in the dial plan. Hope this helps.
Steven Wheeler |
Hello,
thank you for your reply.
Is it the "membername" or the "interface" that needs to be sorted to have a certain order in the call queue ?
How do you remove the prefix (integer) from a call queue member from dialplan ?
If you call the queue in your dialplan as follow :
exten => s,n,Queue(${queuename},,,,${timeout})
How can you "edit" its members ??
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
When asterisk queries the database for queue members it sorts the results based on the value of the interface column. We use local channels for calling agents (i.e. Local/001__agent@queue_calling/n) so your mileage may vary. To strip off the prefix we have the following in our queue_calling context.
[queue_calling]
exten => _XXX__[A-Za-z0-9*#].,1,Goto(${EXTEN:5},1)
exten => _[A-Za-z0-9*#].,1,...
… Logic to call the agent's SIP phone … |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonas.kellens at telen... Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:36 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in cert |
|
|
On 13-02-14 17:33, Steven Wheeler wrote:
Quote: | <![endif]--> <![endif]-->
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:12 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
On 12-02-14 16:58, Steven Wheeler wrote:
Quote: |
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:46 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
Hello,
I'm using MySQL realtime Call Queues (table queues and table queue_members).
I would like to ring the members of the call queue in a certain order. Therefore I use ring strategy lineair and I put the members into the table queue_members in the order in which they have to be rang.
So I have the queue :
| name | musicclass | announce | context | timeout | monitor_type | monitor_format | queue_youarenext | queue_thereare | queue_callswaiting | queue_holdtime | queue_minutes | queue_seconds | queue_lessthan | queue_thankyou | queue_reporthold | announce_frequency | announce_round_seconds | announce_holdtime | announce_position | retry | wrapuptime | maxlen | servicelevel | strategy | joinempty | leavewhenempty | eventmemberstatus | eventwhencalled | reportholdtime | memberdelay | weight | timeoutrestart | periodic_announce | periodic_announce_frequency | ringinuse |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
| queue6 | default | NULL | | 12 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 30 | NULL | No | yes | 5 | 10 | 0 | NULL | linear | strict | strict | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no | | 0 | no |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
and queue members :
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| 44 | queuemem4 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem4 | 0 | NULL |
| 45 | queuemem2 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem2 | 0 | NULL |
| 46 | queuemem5 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem5 | 0 | NULL |
| 47 | queuemem1 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem1 | 0 | NULL |
| 48 | queuemem10 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem10 | 0 | NULL |
| 49 | queuemem18 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem18 | 0 | NULL |
| 50 | queuemem17 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem17 | 0 | NULL |
| 51 | queuemem12 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem12 | 0 | NULL |
| 52 | queuemem16 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem16 | 0 | NULL |
| 53 | queuemem13 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem13 | 0 | NULL |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
You can see that the member queuemem4 is first in line to be rang (has the first and lowest uniqueid in the table).
But the first member that is being rang, is queuemem1. How come ??
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
We encountered the same problem. It is a bug in the Queue application. The Queue application actually orders members by their interface value. Here is the bug report I opened https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480 which was closed as "Not A Bug" by Digium. We worked around this by prepending an integer (001__, 002__, …) to the interface in the database table and then removing it later in the dial plan. Hope this helps.
Steven Wheeler |
Hello,
thank you for your reply.
Is it the "membername" or the "interface" that needs to be sorted to have a certain order in the call queue ?
How do you remove the prefix (integer) from a call queue member from dialplan ?
If you call the queue in your dialplan as follow :
exten => s,n,Queue(${queuename},,,,${timeout})
How can you "edit" its members ??
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
When asterisk queries the database for queue members it sorts the results based on the value of the interface column. We use local channels for calling agents (i.e. Local/001__agent@queue_calling/n) so your mileage may vary. To strip off the prefix we have the following in our queue_calling context.
[queue_calling]
exten => _XXX__[A-Za-z0-9*#].,1,Goto(${EXTEN:5},1)
exten => _[A-Za-z0-9*#].,1,...
… Logic to call the agent's SIP phone …
|
Hello,
I have tried this logic with Local channels and a prefix for sorting in the database, but this creates another problem :
Seemingly my Call Queue is empty, because I get a QUEUESTATUS = JOINEMPTY
This is now my data in my table :
+----------+-------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+-------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------+
| 2381 | 3232323232 | voipq4 | Local/01_3232323232@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
| 2382 | voip1 | voipq4 | Local/02_voip1@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
| 2383 | voip2 | voipq4 | Local/03_voip2@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
| 2384 | 3131313131 | voipq4 | Local/04_3131313131@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
+----------+-------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------+
How can I make the queue members to be logged in to the call queue for accepting calls ?
Kind regards,
Jonas. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SWheeler at usinternet... Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:10 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in cert |
|
|
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
On 13-02-14 17:33, Steven Wheeler wrote:
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:12 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
On 12-02-14 16:58, Steven Wheeler wrote:
Quote: |
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 3:46 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Realtime Call Queues : call members in certain order
Hello,
I'm using MySQL realtime Call Queues (table queues and table queue_members).
I would like to ring the members of the call queue in a certain order. Therefore I use ring strategy lineair and I put the members into the table queue_members in the order in which they have to be rang.
So I have the queue :
| name | musicclass | announce | context | timeout | monitor_type | monitor_format | queue_youarenext | queue_thereare | queue_callswaiting | queue_holdtime | queue_minutes | queue_seconds | queue_lessthan | queue_thankyou | queue_reporthold | announce_frequency | announce_round_seconds | announce_holdtime | announce_position | retry | wrapuptime | maxlen | servicelevel | strategy | joinempty | leavewhenempty | eventmemberstatus | eventwhencalled | reportholdtime | memberdelay | weight | timeoutrestart | periodic_announce | periodic_announce_frequency | ringinuse |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
| queue6 | default | NULL | | 12 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 30 | NULL | No | yes | 5 | 10 | 0 | NULL | linear | strict | strict | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no | | 0 | no |
+----------------+------------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+----------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+------------+--------+--------------+----------+-----------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------+----------------+-------------+--------+----------------+-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------+
and queue members :
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
| 44 | queuemem4 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem4 | 0 | NULL |
| 45 | queuemem2 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem2 | 0 | NULL |
| 46 | queuemem5 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem5 | 0 | NULL |
| 47 | queuemem1 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem1 | 0 | NULL |
| 48 | queuemem10 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem10 | 0 | NULL |
| 49 | queuemem18 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem18 | 0 | NULL |
| 50 | queuemem17 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem17 | 0 | NULL |
| 51 | queuemem12 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem12 | 0 | NULL |
| 52 | queuemem16 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem16 | 0 | NULL |
| 53 | queuemem13 | queue6 | SIP/queuemem13 | 0 | NULL |
+----------+----------------+----------------+--------------------+---------+--------+
You can see that the member queuemem4 is first in line to be rang (has the first and lowest uniqueid in the table).
But the first member that is being rang, is queuemem1. How come ??
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
We encountered the same problem. It is a bug in the Queue application. The Queue application actually orders members by their interface value. Here is the bug report I opened https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480 which was closed as "Not A Bug" by Digium. We worked around this by prepending an integer (001__, 002__, …) to the interface in the database table and then removing it later in the dial plan. Hope this helps.
Steven Wheeler |
Hello,
thank you for your reply.
Is it the "membername" or the "interface" that needs to be sorted to have a certain order in the call queue ?
How do you remove the prefix (integer) from a call queue member from dialplan ?
If you call the queue in your dialplan as follow :
exten => s,n,Queue(${queuename},,,,${timeout})
How can you "edit" its members ??
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
When asterisk queries the database for queue members it sorts the results based on the value of the interface column. We use local channels for calling agents (i.e. Local/001__agent@queue_calling/n) so your mileage may vary. To strip off the prefix we have the following in our queue_calling context.
[queue_calling]
exten => _XXX__[A-Za-z0-9*#].,1,Goto(${EXTEN:5},1)
exten => _[A-Za-z0-9*#].,1,...
… Logic to call the agent's SIP phone …
Hello,
I have tried this logic with Local channels and a prefix for sorting in the database, but this creates another problem :
Seemingly my Call Queue is empty, because I get a QUEUESTATUS = JOINEMPTY
This is now my data in my table :
+----------+-------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------+
| uniqueid | membername | queue_name | interface | penalty | paused |
+----------+-------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------+
| 2381 | 3232323232 | voipq4 | Local/01_3232323232@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
| 2382 | voip1 | voipq4 | Local/02_voip1@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
| 2383 | voip2 | voipq4 | Local/03_voip2@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
| 2384 | 3131313131 | voipq4 | Local/04_3131313131@ExternalCallFromQueue | 0 | NULL |
+----------+-------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------+
How can I make the queue members to be logged in to the call queue for accepting calls ?
Kind regards,
Jonas.
Jonas,
It looks like you are missing the state_interface column. Try adding it with this:
ALTER TABLE `<table name>` ADD COLUMN `state_interface` varchar(128) DEFAULT NULL AFTER `interface`;
You will need to specify a hint for each member, something like:
hint:<membername>@<blf/hint context>
Steven |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|