VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Smither at C-C-I.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:39 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes |
 |
|
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 17:47 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 08:38:31AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
| Quote: | Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on
lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below.
Zaptel doesn't even get a chance.
|
Thanks Tzafrir. The last thing I tried was to downgrade Zaptel and
during the boot, Zaptel reported success(*).
|
What version of Zaptel reported success? Which version has failed?
|
After some frustrating times, I began to suspect the cards. Doing more
careful testing, keeping track of the cards, confirmed that two of four
cards I was trying had problems. I am able to get the two working cards
to be properly configured and they seem to work well.
Thanks for the trouble shooting suggestions from this list!
One last question if someone has an answer - Using Kwelstart signaling *
can detect incoming calls and can detect hang ups, but doesn't seem to
be able to detect when an outgoing (over a Zap channel) call is
answered. Is this correct, or have I not configured something?
I am comparing this to what I have seen with IAX channels. When using
call files, when the IAX channel answers that event in noted on the CLI.
I don't see this with the Zap channel using call files.
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tzafrir.cohen at xorco...
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:47 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes |
|
|
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:39:44PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
| Quote: | One last question if someone has an answer - Using Kwelstart signaling *
can detect incoming calls and can detect hang ups, but doesn't seem to
be able to detect when an outgoing (over a Zap channel) call is
answered. Is this correct, or have I not configured something?
|
Right. This is a known limitation.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vincent.delporte at bi...
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:50 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:39:44 -0600, Bob Smither <Smither at C-C-I.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | After some frustrating times, I began to suspect the cards. Doing more
careful testing, keeping track of the cards, confirmed that two of four
cards I was trying had problems.
|
I had the same issue with three brand new, identical cards. Some were
DOA.
| Quote: | Thanks for the trouble shooting suggestions from this list!
|
Generally speaking, X100/101P cards are a waste of time. If you don't
want to spend the money to buy a Sangoma or even a Digium, OpenVox
makes nice clones of Digium for less money. I bough the
single-FXO-port model for $80. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Search
