VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
modelnine at modelnine... Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 4:56 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11.10.2 update breaks snom TLS tra |
|
|
Hey all,
I've recently updated an Asterisk installation to 11.10.2 (from the
Gentoo packaged build), and the update has (seemingly) broken TLS
transport for snom phones (I could reproduce on snom 3x0 and 7x0 with
8.4.3x and 8.7.x.y firmwares). What happens is that the registration to
the PBX is successful, and inbound calls work normally (i.e., when the
phone is being signalled that a call is coming in), but dispatching a
call from the snom phone to the PBX makes the TLS transport "hang"
(i.e., the PBX doesn't see any more TLS packets from the phone, and
OPTIONS is no longer replied to). The phone then kills the TLS channel
after a while (probably times it out) and Asterisk marks the phone as
unreachable due to QUALIFY, and after some time (roundabout two minutes)
the phone reconnects the TLS channel and is reachable again. I couldn't
reproduce this behaviour with other phones (i.e., Gigaset devices which
I also use with TLS transport).
Is this a known regression, and generally: how can I help diagnose this
problem further for opening a bug-report, besides the description given
above? Has anyone else encountered this and found another workaround
besides switching to TCP/UDP-transport for the phones?
Thanks for any hints in advance!
--
--- Heiko Wundram.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
Back to top |
|
|
modelnine at modelnine... Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 2:48 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11.10.2 update breaks snom TLS tra |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 30.06.2014 11:55, schrieb Heiko Wundram:
Quote: | Is this a known regression, and generally: how can I help diagnose
this problem further for opening a bug-report, besides the
description given above? Has anyone else encountered this and found
another workaround besides switching to TCP/UDP-transport for the
phones?
|
To answer my own question: applying the (latest) patch from
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18345 fixes the
issues with snom phones that I was seeing, but for me only starting
with 11.10.2, earlier releases like those posting in that bug didn't
have the problem I described.
As I haven't looked through the additional implications of that patch
applying to current Asterisk releases, is anybody willing to comment
on whether that patch is safe to apply in production environments?
- --
- --- Heiko.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTsb7lAAoJEDMqpHf921/Sb1oH/j5Xbu6n2OC1WHy1ecVaT65S
Q2AKraCMnAj8IOA0yu+3X41PN5mJnLvuGBFN3BZDFpnrgi3t09MCV3oaZbJ0xrb3
Mfy7EEcoQZMaJDEZK7VY1hR8HZOU22Jg+be0+XIParvUTTprNnyKDgQaum0QFR9x
2ZiKIJyD2g4YdqIu8p/vLK8Jxb22b3aG+Pzu3qfHxVBbVWKB1+yk16YAWOU9mGCW
7leIpi7tN4j3eEU9NoVg/K6cmrP/Lh0iaPesmXD1i710+czcfg4hz/mNOOlYH/5U
iXnoKBGKgltZvsEEAfpOhiDX85moguGjN3zadK0gkSbZDaAv5gQQk1etHTd6VGc=
=HhP6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|