VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jkillen at allamerican...
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:15 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE |
 |
|
Okay, I think I need a sanity check here – If I call a person that’s on the phone, I should get a busy signal.
Now more specifically, a call comes into the pbx via PRI. The destination dialplan runs busy(20). Now, the PRI causecode should get set to 17 (user busy) so that the originating end can play a busy tone, correct?
-Justin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EWieling at nyigc.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:37 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE |
|
|
Generally if you want to send a cause 17 to the caller you would use Hangup(17) and let the caller’s switch generate the busy tone.
If the dialplan has already answered the call, then you might want to use Busy or Playtones.
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE
Okay, I think I need a sanity check here – If I call a person that’s on the phone, I should get a busy signal.
Now more specifically, a call comes into the pbx via PRI. The destination dialplan runs busy(20). Now, the PRI causecode should get set to 17 (user busy) so that the originating end can play a busy tone, correct?
-Justin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jkillen at allamerican...
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:57 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE |
|
|
The description of busy() in the asterisk documentation wiki states:
“This application will indicate the busy condition to the calling channel.”
Wouldn’t ‘indicate the busy condition’ on a PRI channel imply setting cause 17?
-Justin
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 4:38 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE
Generally if you want to send a cause 17 to the caller you would use Hangup(17) and let the caller’s switch generate the busy tone.
If the dialplan has already answered the call, then you might want to use Busy or Playtones.
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE
Okay, I think I need a sanity check here – If I call a person that’s on the phone, I should get a busy signal.
Now more specifically, a call comes into the pbx via PRI. The destination dialplan runs busy(20). Now, the PRI causecode should get set to 17 (user busy) so that the originating end can play a busy tone, correct?
-Justin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EWieling at nyigc.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:02 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE |
|
|
I would have to read the source code to know for sure. Is it too much trouble to try my suggestion?
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:58 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE
The description of busy() in the asterisk documentation wiki states:
“This application will indicate the busy condition to the calling channel.”
Wouldn’t ‘indicate the busy condition’ on a PRI channel imply setting cause 17?
-Justin
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 4:38 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE
Generally if you want to send a cause 17 to the caller you would use Hangup(17) and let the caller’s switch generate the busy tone.
If the dialplan has already answered the call, then you might want to use Busy or Playtones.
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE
Okay, I think I need a sanity check here – If I call a person that’s on the phone, I should get a busy signal.
Now more specifically, a call comes into the pbx via PRI. The destination dialplan runs busy(20). Now, the PRI causecode should get set to 17 (user busy) so that the originating end can play a busy tone, correct?
-Justin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Search
