ruediger at basche.org
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:11 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] Fwd: no ipv6 dns resolution for outbound re |
 |
|
3rd attempt to post it to the list, please ignore if it is duplicate
I have the following problem
When trying to setup asterisk 13.1 with PJSIP to connect to my IPV6 capable SIP provider the registration fails.
| Code: | [Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25247] pjsip: tsx0x110736c .Transaction created for Request msg REGISTER/cseq=36181 (tdta0x721d90)
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25247] pjsip: tsx0x110736c Sending Request msg REGISTER/cseq=36181 (tdta0x721d90) in state Null
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25247] pjsip: sip_resolve.c .Starting async DNS A query: target=[url=http://sip1.easybell.de]sip1.easybell.de[/url], transport=Unspecified, port=5060
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25247] pjsip: resolver.c .Transmitting 34 bytes to NS 0 ([url=http://192.168.178.1:53]192.168.178.1:53[/url]): DNS A query for [url=http://sip1.easybell.de]sip1.easybell.de[/url]: Success
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25247] pjsip: tsx0x110736c .State changed from Null to Calling, event=TX_MSG
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25252] pjsip: resolver.c Received 50 bytes DNS response from [url=http://192.168.178.1:53]192.168.178.1:53[/url]
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25252] pjsip: resolver.c Nameserver [url=http://192.168.178.1:53]192.168.178.1:53[/url] state changed Active --> Active
[Dec 22 19:24:24] WARNING[25252] pjsip: tsx0x110736c Failed to send Request msg REGISTER/cseq=36181 (tdta0x721d90)! err=171064 (Unsuitable transport selected (PJSIP_ETPNOTSUITABLE))
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25252] pjsip: tsx0x110736c State changed from Calling to Terminated, event=TRANSPORT_ERROR
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25252] pjsip: tsx0x110736c Timeout timer event
[Dec 22 19:24:24] WARNING[25247] res_pjsip_outbound_registration.c: No response received from 'sip:[url=http://sip1.easybell.de:5060]sip1.easybell.de:5060[/url]' on registration attempt to '[url=http://sip:004970718604945@sip1.easybell.de:5060]sip:004970718604945@sip1.easybell.de:5060[/url]', retrying in '60'
[Dec 22 19:24:24] DEBUG[25252] pjsip: tsx0x110736c .State changed from Terminated to Destroyed, event=TIMER
|
For my naive eyes it looks as if there is no ipv6 name resolution (a DNS AAAA query) performed.
Here are the (relevant) entries in the configuration files:
pjsip.conf
| Code: | [udp-ipv6]
type=transport
protocol=udp
bind=[2a02:8070:86c0:2ca0:ba27:ebff:feda:bbb6]:5060
...
[endpoint-ipv6](!)
type=endpoint
context=ExternalSets
transport=udp-ipv6
rtp_ipv6=yes
disallow=all
;allow=g722
allow=alaw
allow=gsm
allow=g726
allow=ulaw
[registration-ipv6](!)
type=registration
transport=udp-ipv6
;auth_rejection_permanent=no
retry_interval=60
[easybell](registration-ipv6)
outbound_auth=easybell
server_uri=sip:[url=http://sip1.easybell.de:5060]sip1.easybell.de:5060[/url]
client_uri=sip:<userid>@[url=http://sip1.easybell.de:5060]sip1.easybell.de:5060[/url]
[easybell](endpoint-ipv6)
;context=ExternalSets
outbound_auth=easybell
aors=easybell |
The own IPV6 address is recognized:
| Code: | [Dec 22 19:24:14] DEBUG[25222] pjsip: udpv60x998200 SIP UDP IPv6 transport started, published address is [2a02:8070:86c0:2ca0:ba27:ebff:feda:bbb6]:5060
...
[Dec 22 19:24:20] VERBOSE[25222] res_pjsip_multihomed.c: Local IPv4 address determined to be: 192.168.178.99
[Dec 22 19:24:20] VERBOSE[25222] res_pjsip_multihomed.c: Local IPv6 address determined to be: [2a02:8070:86c0:2ca0:ba27:ebff:feda:bbb6] |
The IP address of the partner is recognized:
| Code: | [Dec 22 19:24:20] VERBOSE[25222] config.c: Parsing '/etc/asterisk/pjsip.conf': Found
[Dec 22 19:24:20] DEBUG[25222] netsock2.c: Splitting '[url=http://sip1.easybell.de]sip1.easybell.de[/url]' into...
[Dec 22 19:24:20] DEBUG[25222] netsock2.c: ...host '[url=http://sip1.easybell.de]sip1.easybell.de[/url]' and port ''.
[Dec 22 19:24:20] DEBUG[25222] netsock2.c: Splitting '2001:4090:4008::124' into...
[Dec 22 19:24:20] DEBUG[25222] netsock2.c: ...host '2001:4090:4008::124' and port ''.
[Dec 22 19:24:20] DEBUG[25222] acl.c: [2001:4090:4008::124]:0/[ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff]:0 sense 0 appended to ACL |
The problem is when Asterisk tries to register with the other host.
Anyone have an idea what is wrong or missing, I am appreciating any hint.
Thank you in advance!
Rüdiger
--
Rüdiger Basche - ruediger@basche.org (ruediger@basche.org)
--
Rüdiger Basche - ruediger@basche.org (ruediger@basche.org) |
|
Search
