VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
asterisk at voipbusine... Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 2:32 pm Post subject: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source |
|
|
All;
My company has written a multi-tenant, multi-user single fax and fax broadcasting system for Asterisk that we want to release as open source. The package seems to be popular with ITSP’s. The package is extremely feature-rich and has been available for several years now so it has a stable code base. A list of some of its features can be found here: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/VoIP+Business+Solutions. So my question is this, what are the best ways to publicize the product now that it's open source?
Thanks;
John V.
Tech Support
Tech Support
VoIP Business Solutions
240-215-3479 x325
support@voipbusiness.us (fsd@voipbusiness.us) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
afshin9 at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 3:01 pm Post subject: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source |
|
|
nowadays, github.com is probably the most popular place for any source code.
You can also use Atlasian products, which for opensource would be free, you can use Confluence for documentation, Bitbucket for source control and Jira for Issue Tracking.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Disclaimer: I am NOT affiliated with Github or Atlasian in anyways. these are all my personal opinions.
AFShin Seysan
www.Callynx.com
afshin at collynx .dot com
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Tech Support <asterisk@voipbusiness.us (asterisk@voipbusiness.us)> wrote:
Quote: |
All;
My company has written a multi-tenant, multi-user single fax and fax broadcasting system for Asterisk that we want to release as open source. The package seems to be popular with ITSP’s. The package is extremely feature-rich and has been available for several years now so it has a stable code base. A list of some of its features can be found here: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/VoIP+Business+Solutions. So my question is this, what are the best ways to publicize the product now that it's open source?
Thanks;
John V.
Tech Support
Tech Support
VoIP Business Solutions
[url=tel:(240)%20215-3479]240-215-3479 x325[/url]
support@voipbusiness.us (fsd@voipbusiness.us)
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
miconda at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 3:27 pm Post subject: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source |
|
|
On 17/01/2017 21:01, AFShin Seysan wrote:
Quote: | nowadays, github.com is probably the most popular place for any source code.
You can also use Atlasian products, which for opensource would be free, you can use Confluence for documentation, Bitbucket for source control and Jira for Issue Tracking.
Let me know if you have any questions.
|
Github.com is indeed popular and serves the most needs of dealing with open source project development and collaboration (issue tracker, pull requests, reviews, etc...). But of course, you don't have full control and sometimes you reach some limitations. At kamailio we had to write some script) to hook into their APIs because we wanted a special email format for notifications as well as keep a mirror in near real time (for who is interested to read more, I published it as OSS: https://github.com/miconda/gitpushub). Another limitation is not offering private repository without paying. As an OSS project, sometimes you want to keep few admin scripts private.
Bitbucket offers private repos for free. I haven't used it much and not integrated with Jira/Confluence. So it might not be the case there, but I find it a hassle not to have the issue tracker, version control, review system in the same portal for an OSS project -- it can add overhead to administration, taking cycles from other OSS activities. We did it in the past and I would not return there. The story can be different if you have dedicated sysadmin resources.
Gitlab.com is another alternative for hosting OSS project -- I haven't used it, so no first hand experience. But Gitlab can be also self-hosted (the suite of tools used there is open source), however it is seems to require a dedicated system for an easy installation and maintenance, be safe to not break other services.
gogs.io is a lighter version for self hosting git repositories and get the look and many of the features a la github (issue tracker, wiki, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sidney at oncallcentra... Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 3:34 pm Post subject: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source |
|
|
+1 for GitHub. We used gitlab internally for about two years. Works well overall, but they put out updates about every 18 seconds and it becomes a lot of work to keep it fully up-to-date. Recently decided to throw in the towel and move everything to Amazon’s CodeCommit. Zero issues so far and free for first 5 devs. Quote: | On Jan 17, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com (miconda@gmail.com)> wrote:
On 17/01/2017 21:01, AFShin Seysan wrote: Quote: | nowadays, github.com is probably the most popular place for any source code.
You can also use Atlasian products, which for opensource would be free, you can use Confluence for documentation, Bitbucket for source control and Jira for Issue Tracking.
Let me know if you have any questions.
| Github.com is indeed popular and serves the most needs of dealing with open source project development and collaboration (issue tracker, pull requests, reviews, etc...). But of course, you don't have full control and sometimes you reach some limitations. At kamailio we had to write some script) to hook into their APIs because we wanted a special email format for notifications as well as keep a mirror in near real time (for who is interested to read more, I published it as OSS: https://github.com/miconda/gitpushub). Another limitation is not offering private repository without paying. As an OSS project, sometimes you want to keep few admin scripts private. Bitbucket offers private repos for free. I haven't used it much and not integrated with Jira/Confluence. So it might not be the case there, but I find it a hassle not to have the issue tracker, version control, review system in the same portal for an OSS project -- it can add overhead to administration, taking cycles from other OSS activities. We did it in the past and I would not return there. The story can be different if you have dedicated sysadmin resources. Gitlab.com is another alternative for hosting OSS project -- I haven't used it, so no first hand experience. But Gitlab can be also self-hosted (the suite of tools used there is open source), however it is seems to require a dedicated system for an easy installation and maintenance, be safe to not break other services. gogs.io is a lighter version for self hosting git repositories and get the look and many of the features a la github (issue tracker, wiki, ...). Cheers, Daniel
-- _____________________________________________________________________-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --asterisk-biz mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
asterisk at voipbusine... Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:18 am Post subject: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source |
|
|
These are all great answers and are very useful, but my question is this. What's the best way to “get the word out” that our server is being open sourced? What would you guys do if you were doing this?
Thanks a Million;
John V.
From: asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 03:27 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source
On 17/01/2017 21:01, AFShin Seysan wrote:
nowadays, github.com is probably the most popular place for any source code.
You can also use Atlasian products, which for opensource would be free, you can use Confluence for documentation, Bitbucket for source control and Jira for Issue Tracking.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Github.com is indeed popular and serves the most needs of dealing with open source project development and collaboration (issue tracker, pull requests, reviews, etc...). But of course, you don't have full control and sometimes you reach some limitations. At kamailio we had to write some script) to hook into their APIs because we wanted a special email format for notifications as well as keep a mirror in near real time (for who is interested to read more, I published it as OSS: https://github.com/miconda/gitpushub). Another limitation is not offering private repository without paying. As an OSS project, sometimes you want to keep few admin scripts private.
Bitbucket offers private repos for free. I haven't used it much and not integrated with Jira/Confluence. So it might not be the case there, but I find it a hassle not to have the issue tracker, version control, review system in the same portal for an OSS project -- it can add overhead to administration, taking cycles from other OSS activities. We did it in the past and I would not return there. The story can be different if you have dedicated sysadmin resources.
Gitlab.com is another alternative for hosting OSS project -- I haven't used it, so no first hand experience. But Gitlab can be also self-hosted (the suite of tools used there is open source), however it is seems to require a dedicated system for an easy installation and maintenance, be safe to not break other services.
gogs.io is a lighter version for self hosting git repositories and get the look and many of the features a la github (issue tracker, wiki, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tahir at ictinnovation... Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:19 am Post subject: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source |
|
|
We have experience in open source projects like http://www.ictfax.org and will share our experience with you .
Do not use commercial advertisement platform to promote open source project.
Do on-page SEO of your site with open source and free keywords
Place your source code at both sourceforge.net and github
Create a forum for open source community and provide support to visitors .
Press release / News at voip-info.org , asterisk.org ( you already did ) and other related sites .
that is all and rest open source community and google search engine will do themselves and you need not to worry about it
regards
Tahir Almas
Managing Partner
ICT Innovations
http://www.ictinnovations.com
Leveraging open source in ICT
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Tech Support <asterisk@voipbusiness.us (asterisk@voipbusiness.us)> wrote:
Quote: |
These are all great answers and are very useful, but my question is this. What's the best way to “get the word out” that our server is being open sourced? What would you guys do if you were doing this?
Thanks a Million;
John V.
From: asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com) [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com (asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com)] On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 03:27 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Releasing software as open source
On 17/01/2017 21:01, AFShin Seysan wrote:
nowadays, github.com is probably the most popular place for any source code.
You can also use Atlasian products, which for opensource would be free, you can use Confluence for documentation, Bitbucket for source control and Jira for Issue Tracking.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Github.com is indeed popular and serves the most needs of dealing with open source project development and collaboration (issue tracker, pull requests, reviews, etc...). But of course, you don't have full control and sometimes you reach some limitations. At kamailio we had to write some script) to hook into their APIs because we wanted a special email format for notifications as well as keep a mirror in near real time (for who is interested to read more, I published it as OSS: https://github.com/miconda/gitpushub). Another limitation is not offering private repository without paying. As an OSS project, sometimes you want to keep few admin scripts private.
Bitbucket offers private repos for free. I haven't used it much and not integrated with Jira/Confluence. So it might not be the case there, but I find it a hassle not to have the issue tracker, version control, review system in the same portal for an OSS project -- it can add overhead to administration, taking cycles from other OSS activities. We did it in the past and I would not return there. The story can be different if you have dedicated sysadmin resources.
Gitlab.com is another alternative for hosting OSS project -- I haven't used it, so no first hand experience. But Gitlab can be also self-hosted (the suite of tools used there is open source), however it is seems to require a dedicated system for an easy installation and maintenance, be safe to not break other services.
gogs.io is a lighter version for self hosting git repositories and get the look and many of the features a la github (issue tracker, wiki, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|