VoIP Mailing List Archives

[steve.langstaff at cit...]

"ValetParking doesn't announce anything because the whole point of
ValetParking is to be able to explicitly park a call at a known spot."

I was under the impression that the "Valet" part of "ValetParking" meant
that you *don't* explicitly park a call at a known spot - the valet
takes your call, finds a free spot for it and then tells you where it
has been parked.

Of course, parking voice may be nothing like parking vehicles
________________________________

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of marvin
horst
Sent: 05 February 2008 13:32
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] app_valetparking.c anyone using it
on 1.4?




Hi List,

I have this running, but after I park a call it will not
announce where it is at, it's like you have to call another application
just to say where it is parked at. I have tried a second priority option
for the same extension with that ValetParkList but it seems once
ValetParkCall has been ended it will not process anymore priorities in
this extension.

Any ideals or help would be great!




I'm using ValetParking with 1.4. ValetParking doesn't announce
anything because the whole point of ValetParking is to be able to
explicitly park a call at a known spot. We use it to park a call at a
users extension when they aren't at their desk, or are on another call.
When they're finished with the call or they're paged all they have to do
is dial their known park location.

I haven't had any problems with priority options.
--
Marvin Horst

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080206/201cf024/attachment.htm

[aspendora at gmail.com]

On Feb 6, 2008 3:46 AM, Steve Langstaff <steve.langstaff at citel.com> wrote:

[steve.langstaff at cit...]

[ronmccar at gmail.com]

Ahh ok, this makes a little more sense now! I guess it is a different way of
looking of it.

Thanks
On Feb 6, 2008 5:28 AM, Steve Langstaff <steve.langstaff at citel.com> wrote: