VoIP Mailing List Archives

[jason at ttnc.co.uk]

I was hoping someone could help clarify on whether re-invites are supposed to pass between both legs of a call when a call is placed on hold? As far as I can see, the re-invite when a caller is placed on hold is passed to FreeSWITCH but it is not passed on to the other leg. The issue I’m having is the SDP body changes of a=sendonly or a=sendrecieve never reach the other leg.

Is this intended behaviour? Is there a way to change this?

Kind regards
Jason Grant

[christian.berger at fo...]

Am 20.07.21 um 10:57 schrieb Jason Grant:

[ramelcom at gmail.com]

Hi Jason, 

FreeSWITCH is B2BUA and not a proxy. So, reINVITEs are not passed across other legs.
The parameter 'rtp_pass_codecs_on_reinvite' when set to true and configured in dialplan, takes care of this when there is codec change in the reinvite. 



Thanks
Ramesh


On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 9:06 AM Christian Berger <christian.berger@foncloud.net (christian.berger@foncloud.net)> wrote:

[freeswitch-users at li...]

------ Start of attached email. Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Re-Invite not passed to other leg ------
Jason,
You need to make the source code change to do that.
/Kaiduan On Tuesday, July 20, 2021, 11:46:34 a.m. EDT, Ramesh Kandasamy <ramelcom@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Jason, 
FreeSWITCH is B2BUA and not a proxy. So, reINVITEs are not passed across other legs.The parameter 'rtp_pass_codecs_on_reinvite' when set to true and configured in dialplan, takes care of this when there is codec change in the reinvite. 

ThanksRamesh
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 9:06 AM Christian Berger <christian.berger@foncloud.net> wrote:

Am 20.07.21 um 10:57 schrieb Jason Grant: