VoIP Mailing List Archives

[freeswitch-users at li...]

------ Start of attached email. Subject: ICE -> FreeSWITCH tries exclusively the first candidate ------
Hi,



currently I have the problem that the FreeSWITCH only serves the first
candidate from the candidate list via STUN request.

I expected it to try to reach all candidates relatively soon (trickle).

In the source code I saw that there are four ICE types:

ICE_GOOGLE_JINGLE

ICE_VANILLA

ICE_CONTROLLED

ICE_LITE



What is behind them, and how can I select them from the "outside"?

Or am I on the wrong track? What to do, that the FreeSwitch serves the
candidates according to Trickle?



I have the same result for mod_sofia and mod_verto (is clear, they use the
same media stack).



Thanks and greetings

Alex


------ End of attached email ------
_________________________________________________________________________

The FreeSWITCH project is sponsored by SignalWire https://signalwire.com
Enhance your FreeSWITCH install with disruptive priced SMS and PSTN services.
Build your next product on our scalable cloud platform.

Join our online community to chat in real time https://signalwire.community

Professional FreeSWITCH Services
sales@freeswitch.com
https://freeswitch.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
https://freeswitch.com/oss
https://freeswitch.org/confluence
https://cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
https://freeswitch.com

[Alexander.Haugg at c4b.de]

What is to be done so that the Freeswitch also serves the other candidates and not only the first one?
Independently of Trickle, of course.

Is the trickle implementation being worked on?
Or can this be financially favored?

Thanks a lot
Alex

Von: FreeSWITCH-users <freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org> Im Auftrag von Alexander Haugg
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. August 2021 13:13
An: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] ICE -> FreeSWITCH tries exclusively the first candidate



Thanks for the info.
Is Trickle being worked on right now, or would it be possible to fund an eventual Trickle implementation?

Also with vanilla ICE the next candidate would have to be tried at some point, but that doesn't seem to happen.
Is there a configurable candidate timeout property for this?

Thanks a lot

Von: FreeSWITCH-users <freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org (freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org)> Im Auftrag von krice@freeswitch.org (krice@freeswitch.org)
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. August 2021 18:32
An: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org (freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org)>
Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] ICE -> FreeSWITCH tries exclusively the first candidate



Freeswitch at this time does not support trickle ice

From: FreeSWITCH-users <freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org (freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org)> On Behalf Of Alexander Haugg
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 12:53 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org (freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org)
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] ICE -> FreeSWITCH tries exclusively the first candidate



Hi,

currently I have the problem that the FreeSWITCH only serves the first candidate from the candidate list via STUN request.
I expected it to try to reach all candidates relatively soon (trickle).
In the source code I saw that there are four ICE types:
ICE_GOOGLE_JINGLE
ICE_VANILLA
ICE_CONTROLLED
ICE_LITE

What is behind them, and how can I select them from the "outside"?
Or am I on the wrong track? What to do, that the FreeSwitch serves the candidates according to Trickle?

I have the same result for mod_sofia and mod_verto (is clear, they use the same media stack).

Thanks and greetings
Alex