freeswitch-users at li... Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:13 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] extension forced public context if IP is |
|
|
------ Start of attached email. Subject: extension forced public context if IP is in ACL ------
Greetings,
I came across a recent thread
http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2022-November/136043.html
discussing similar problems but it is not clear what solution is.
I my case incoming Gateway and ATA adapter, logged in to an Extension,
are on the same IP address.
I added my IP to an ACL to allow incoming calls from Gateway to an
Extension. No question about this part.
However, exactly as in above mentioned thread, attempt to make outgoing
call fails because Extension IP matches ACL and is forced into public
context instead of domain context.
If I delete ACL then outgoing calls work but incoming rejected.
Is there a solution for above scenario? For example, is it possible to
configure incoming Gateway without a need for ACL?
Josh.
PS. Since I am using FusionPBX all configuration appears to be in
postgresql db tables.
PPS. Explicitly setting up domain context to an Extension in FusionPBX
UI makes no difference whatsoever.
------ End of attached email ------
_________________________________________________________________________
The FreeSWITCH project is sponsored by SignalWire https://signalwire.com
Enhance your FreeSWITCH install with disruptive priced SMS and PSTN services.
Build your next product on our scalable cloud platform.
Join our online community to chat in real time https://signalwire.community
Professional FreeSWITCH Services
sales@freeswitch.com
https://freeswitch.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
https://freeswitch.com/oss
https://freeswitch.org/confluence
https://cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
https://freeswitch.com |
|