VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zoachien at securax.org
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:43 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
 |
|
Afaik its per encode / decoder pair.
In this case you will need 32 simultaneous encoders / decoders between
g729 and slin, so you would need 32 licenses.
Contact digium sales/support directly and you will know for sure 
Zoa
Carlos Chavez wrote:
| Quote: | I need a refresher course on how many licenses I need to buy. I have
an Asterisk server that receives calls by SIP (G729) and then sends them
to the PSTN via 32 Zap interfaces on an Astribank. I cannot remember if
the license is per channel or per call so I do not know if I need 32 or
64 licenses for this application. Could anyone please remind me?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moises.silva at gmail.com
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stotaro at totarotechn...
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:11 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
Required by all (with the exception of academic work possibly?)
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Eugen Soare <eugen.soare at gmail.com> wrote:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nachogomez at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:29 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
Another silly question,
In the first Digium link posted before there is a line that said "*The G.729
codec works with all Digium cards*", but this license will work with a
Sangoma Remora Card??? Or do I need to buy it from Sangoma??? (I don't know
if the are selling G729 licenses)
Thanks...
--
Raul Gomez
Linux Counter #156439
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Steve Totaro <
stotaro at totarotechnologies.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Required by all (with the exception of academic work possibly?)
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Eugen Soare <eugen.soare at gmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
Silly newbie question. Is the license only required for the Digium
|
product?
them
| Quote: | to the PSTN via 32 Zap interfaces on an Astribank. I cannot remember if
the license is per channel or per call so I do not know if I need 32 or
64 licenses for this application. Could anyone please remind me?
--
Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V.
Carlos Ch?vez Prats
Director de Tecnolog?a
+52-55-91169161 ext 2001
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080419/1b45a521/attachment-0001.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
Ra?l G?mez C. wrote:
| Quote: | Another silly question,
In the first Digium link posted before there is a line that said "*The G.729
codec works with all Digium cards*", but this license will work with a
Sangoma Remora Card??? Or do I need to buy it from Sangoma??? (I don't know
if the are selling G729 licenses)
|
The codec in use for a specific channel doesn't even care if that
channel exists over zapata analog or digital cards, sip channels, iax[2]
channels, smoke signals, etc. If you care to use ping pong balls
and the atlantic ocean as your medium, you should be able to interface
with the g729 codec if you still needed to  Although I wouldn't
expect there to be much error correction inherent in the Atlantic.
The codecs are modules for *asterisk* and not for the cards themselves.
Moj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nachogomez at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
LOL!!! Thanks Mojo!
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC <
mojo at horanappraisals.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Ra?l G?mez C. wrote:
| Quote: | Another silly question,
In the first Digium link posted before there is a line that said "*The
|
G.729
| Quote: | codec works with all Digium cards*", but this license will work with a
Sangoma Remora Card??? Or do I need to buy it from Sangoma??? (I don't
|
know
| Quote: | if the are selling G729 licenses)
|
The codec in use for a specific channel doesn't even care if that
channel exists over zapata analog or digital cards, sip channels, iax[2]
channels, smoke signals, etc. If you care to use ping pong balls
and the atlantic ocean as your medium, you should be able to interface
with the g729 codec if you still needed to Although I wouldn't
expect there to be much error correction inherent in the Atlantic.
The codecs are modules for *asterisk* and not for the cards themselves.
Moj
|
--
Raul Gomez
Linux Counter #156439
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080419/07f2fb4d/attachment.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:20 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
Ra?l G?mez C. wrote:
| Quote: | LOL!!! Thanks Mojo!
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC <
mojo at horanappraisals.com> wrote:
| Quote: | The codec in use for a specific channel doesn't even care if that
channel exists over zapata analog or digital cards, sip channels, iax[2]
channels, smoke signals, etc. If you care to use ping pong balls
and the atlantic ocean as your medium, you should be able to interface
with the g729 codec if you still needed to Although I wouldn't
expect there to be much error correction inherent in the Atlantic.
The codecs are modules for *asterisk* and not for the cards themselves.
Moj
|
|
Hehe you got it =D |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
atis at iq-labs.net
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:35 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
| Quote: | The codec in use for a specific channel doesn't even care if that
channel exists over zapata analog or digital cards, sip channels, iax[2]
channels, smoke signals, etc. If you care to use ping pong balls
and the atlantic ocean as your medium, you should be able to interface
with the g729 codec if you still needed to Although I wouldn't
expect there to be much error correction inherent in the Atlantic.
|
I would not risk sending my data trough new cutting edge transports
You mentioned. Instead I prefer to use proven technologies, and
preferably documented in RFC - for example RFC 2549 IP over Avian
Carriers with Quality of Service. There are even some modifications to
this by using flash cards instead of paper, and that beats speed of
ADSL. However that still doesn't seems best for my VoIP traffic
because of latency.
| Quote: | The codecs are modules for *asterisk* and not for the cards themselves.
|
That's true.
Regards,
Atis
--
Atis Lezdins,
VoIP Project Manager / Developer,
atis at iq-labs.net
Skype: atis.lezdins
Cell Phone: +371 28806004
Cell Phone: +1 800 7300689
Work phone: +1 800 7502835 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:48 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
Atis Lezdins wrote:
| Quote: | | Quote: | The codec in use for a specific channel doesn't even care if that
channel exists over zapata analog or digital cards, sip channels, iax[2]
channels, smoke signals, etc. If you care to use ping pong balls
and the atlantic ocean as your medium, you should be able to interface
with the g729 codec if you still needed to Although I wouldn't
expect there to be much error correction inherent in the Atlantic.
|
I would not risk sending my data trough new cutting edge transports
You mentioned. Instead I prefer to use proven technologies, and
preferably documented in RFC - for example RFC 2549 IP over Avian
Carriers with Quality of Service. There are even some modifications to
this by using flash cards instead of paper, and that beats speed of
ADSL. However that still doesn't seems best for my VoIP traffic
because of latency.
| Quote: | The codecs are modules for *asterisk* and not for the cards themselves.
|
That's true.
Regards,
Atis
|
We at Atlantic ColdStreak are pleased to offer SLA, Sea Lion
Augmentation, to even our most basic transatlantic voip packages. The
ping pong balls have a 99.99% 'up'time, guaranteed to float until eaten.
--
*Mojo Wentworth*
HORAN & COMPANY, LLC
403 Lincoln Street, Suite 210
Sitka, AK 99835
(907) 747-6666
(907) 747-7417 - Fax
mojo at horanappraisals.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tzafrir.cohen at xorco...
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:12 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Atis Lezdins wrote:
| Quote: | | Quote: | The codec in use for a specific channel doesn't even care if that
channel exists over zapata analog or digital cards, sip channels, iax[2]
channels, smoke signals, etc. If you care to use ping pong balls
and the atlantic ocean as your medium, you should be able to interface
with the g729 codec if you still needed to Although I wouldn't
expect there to be much error correction inherent in the Atlantic.
|
I would not risk sending my data trough new cutting edge transports
You mentioned. Instead I prefer to use proven technologies, and
preferably documented in RFC - for example RFC 2549 IP over Avian
Carriers with Quality of Service. There are even some modifications to
this by using flash cards instead of paper, and that beats speed of
ADSL. However that still doesn't seems best for my VoIP traffic
because of latency.
|
While Mojo here is busy blatantly promoting his commercial servises
in this non-commercial list using ideas that plainly don't even hold
water, here is something that does:
http://wiki.notacon.org/AnythingButEthernet/TCP-over-Bass
You can also get some ideas from here:
http://wiki.notacon.org/AnythingButEthernet/Armistice
(BTW: add a to this post whereever necessary  )
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
g.stewart at horwits.c...
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:53 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:37:32 -0800, "Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC"
<mojo at horanappraisals.com> wrote:
| Quote: | If you care to use ping pong balls and the atlantic ocean as your medium,
you should be able to interface with the g729 codec if you still needed
to
|
I've heard that RFC1149-compliant devices work well with g729 as well
--
Godwin Stewart - Horwich IT services |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joakimsen at gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] G729 license count... |
|
|
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Godwin Stewart Horwich IT Services
<g.stewart at horwits.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:37:32 -0800, "Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC"
<mojo at horanappraisals.com> wrote:
| Quote: | If you care to use ping pong balls and the atlantic ocean as your medium,
you should be able to interface with the g729 codec if you still needed
to
|
I've heard that RFC1149-compliant devices work well with g729 as well
|
And how did you manage to get the latency down to a tolerable level? I
mean... it's a great idea an all but when I'm talking to someone on
the phone I like to hear their response that same hour and using
RFC1149-type connections just makes the VoIP latency unbearable for
me. Have you run this setup in production with any clients? What have
been their thoughts on it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Search
