VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nelson.granados at gma...
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:53 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] GXW 4108 asterisk configuration |
 |
|
Dear,
I'm having problems with the configuration of this gateway(GrandStream GXW
4108), I used the instructions from GrandStream but it doesn't work. Someone
has a good configuration for this gateway?
Thanks in advance,
Nelson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080617/31f29c73/attachment.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jvaldes at intercom.co...
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:19 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] GXW 4108 asterisk configuration |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nelson Granados wrote:
| Quote: | GXW 4108 asterisk configuration
Dear,
I'm having problems with the configuration of this
gateway(GrandStream GXW 4108), I used the instructions from
GrandStream but it doesn?t work. Someone has a good configuration
for this gateway?
Thanks in advance,
Nelson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
Yeah... it took me some digging but finally got it working by
following the instructions provided by Grandstream. What is it exactly
the problem?
- --
Jorge Valdes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIWVGXvseWMACI1MYRAnZEAJ9saY6ogO8eEwmYqVCThwp0ODjGpACZAaoE
ZZsys6XMvUGShDHmuESS4Mk=
=en2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doug at NaTel.net
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:56 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] GXW 4108 asterisk configuration |
|
|
What EXACTLY is the problem?
There is a bug in these units that won't let
you put punctuation in the extension name.
Also I am having problems with a unit that
disrupts the network. Still haven't found
out what exactly is going on.
This is with a GXW4024.
At 13:19 6/18/2008, Jorge Valdes, wrote:
| Quote: | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nelson Granados wrote:
| Quote: | GXW 4108 asterisk configuration
Dear,
I'm having problems with the configuration of this
gateway(GrandStream GXW 4108), I used the instructions from
GrandStream but it doesn???t work. Someone has a good configuration
for this gateway?
Thanks in advance,
Nelson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
Yeah... it took me some digging but finally got it working by
following the instructions provided by Grandstream. What is it exactly
the problem?
- --
Jorge Valdes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIWVGXvseWMACI1MYRAnZEAJ9saY6ogO8eEwmYqVCThwp0ODjGpACZAaoE
ZZsys6XMvUGShDHmuESS4Mk=
=en2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rob at hillis.dyndns.org
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:14 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] GXW 4108 asterisk configuration |
|
|
Doug wrote:
| Quote: | There is a bug in these units that won't let
you put punctuation in the extension name.
|
A Grandstream product with a bug... what an unusual concept. <cough>
Seriously, with all the grief I've had with GXP-2000s, BT-200s and
GXV-3000s, I wouldn't touch Grandstream gear with a barge pole any
more. Yes, the firmware for the GXP-2000s seems to have finally
stabilised, but it's taken the better part of three /years/ for this to
happen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peder at networkoblivi...
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] GXW 4108 asterisk configuration |
|
|
They still have issues. If you use TCP and reboot the server, the phone
will never reconnect as it tries to use a closed TCP session. I opened
a ticket with them and after a week their answer is ..... "use udp".
Rob Hillis wrote:
| Quote: | Doug wrote:
| Quote: | There is a bug in these units that won't let
you put punctuation in the extension name.
|
A Grandstream product with a bug... what an unusual concept. <cough>
Seriously, with all the grief I've had with GXP-2000s, BT-200s and
GXV-3000s, I wouldn't touch Grandstream gear with a barge pole any
more. Yes, the firmware for the GXP-2000s seems to have finally
stabilised, but it's taken the better part of three /years/ for this to
happen.
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rob at hillis.dyndns.org
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 10:58 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] GXW 4108 asterisk configuration |
|
|
Like I said, I wouldn't touch Grandstream gear with a barge pole any
more. I can point you at at a few companies that hold exactly the same
opinion too.
Don't expect any useful action on the TCP stuff anytime soon - at least
not on a version of firmware that doesn't introduce any other nasty
problems. This is one reason I won't upgrade from 1.1.6.16 for a very
long time on the one install I have to support with Grandstreams (since
I recommended them in the first place) This is working nicely here, and
I've been bitten too many times by upgrading to a new "improved" version
that you subsequently can't downgrade from when you discover some of the
undocumented "improvements".
Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote:
| Quote: | They still have issues. If you use TCP and reboot the server, the phone
will never reconnect as it tries to use a closed TCP session. I opened
a ticket with them and after a week their answer is ..... "use udp".
Rob Hillis wrote:
| Quote: | Doug wrote:
| Quote: | There is a bug in these units that won't let
you put punctuation in the extension name.
|
A Grandstream product with a bug... what an unusual concept. <cough>
Seriously, with all the grief I've had with GXP-2000s, BT-200s and
GXV-3000s, I wouldn't touch Grandstream gear with a barge pole any
more. Yes, the firmware for the GXP-2000s seems to have finally
stabilised, but it's taken the better part of three /years/ for this to
happen.
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
!DSPAM:485b955a40254742053641!
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Search
