VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ronmccar at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:05 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can I have FS send a 503? |
|
|
Hi,
Is it possible to have FS send a 503 / no route found error back? I have looked and have not seen a place where you can add a custom sip response code like this. I want to return a 503 if they can't call that destination, instead of a 404 basically.
Any help would be great, thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthony.minessale at g... Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:15 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can I have FS send a 503? |
|
|
We use the standard rfc q.850 to sip cause code map so you can set continue_on_fail=true and hangup with the q.850 that maps to 503 (I forgot what it is atm)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronmccar at gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:48 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can I have FS send a 503? |
|
|
I actaully just used respond with a 503 and that sends back a "Service unavailable".
If I do: <anti-action application="hangup" data="NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION" /> I get a busy back on the other side, it looks like application="respond" actaully works better in this case.
Thanks for the help!
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com (anthony.minessale@gmail.com)> wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrene_lists at avgs.ca Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:56 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can I have FS send a 503? |
|
|
NORMAL_CIRCUIT_CONGESTION would've been the cause you were looking for.
Mathieu
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ron McCarthy <ronmccar@gmail.com (ronmccar@gmail.com)> wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
krice at freeswitch.org Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:24 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] Can I have FS send a 503? |
|
|
You can make the respond app reply with any sip message you want...
Example
<action application=”respond” data=”503 Go Away”/>
<action application=”respond” data=”402 Payment Required”/>
K
From: Mathieu Rene <mrene_lists@avgs.ca>
Reply-To: <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:53:09 -0500
To: <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Can I have FS send a 503?
NORMAL_CIRCUIT_CONGESTION would've been the cause you were looking for.
Mathieu
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ron McCarthy <ronmccar@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: | I actaully just used respond with a 503 and that sends back a "Service unavailable".
If I do: <anti-action application="hangup" data="NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION" /> I get a busy back on the other side, it looks like application="respond" actaully works better in this case.
Thanks for the help!
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: |
We use the standard rfc q.850 to sip cause code map so you can set continue_on_fail=true and hangup with the q.850 that maps to 503 (I forgot what it is atm)
|
| _______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|