VoIP Mailing List Archives
Mailing list archives for the VoIP community |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Prometheus001 at gmx.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:05 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request |
|
|
Hello,
we have the following problem.
2 Fax machines are communicating via Freeswitch. One is externally
attached via a Telco who is able to handle T.38. The other one is
attached locally.
When 2 Fax machines start syncing each other, the Telco sends a SIP
UPDATE message with T.38 SDP, as it detects fax during the fax negociations.
Freeswitch answers with an SIP OK message back to the telco, and I can
see the T.38 SDP on the debug console of freeswitch.
Then nothing happens any more until one of fax machines detects timeout.
We have set proxy-media to true. However is was done during call setup
when both machines communicated with G711 SDP.
The UPDATE message was commited by FS to the telco, but was not sent to
the other fax, so I think in this case Freeswitch is supposed to
transcode between T.38 and G711 which it cannot do, as we know.
How can I overcome this scenario? Is this a defect, should freeswitch
send the UPDATE message to the other fax? Or is there a workaround?
Best regards
Peter
Here's the UPDATE message:
UPDATE sip:mod_sofia@82.115.xx.xxx:5080 SIP/2.0.
Call-ID: 5283fe4e-334f-122d-d1b9-001517956764.
Contact: <sip:212.91.xxx.xxx:5060>.
Content-Type: application/sdp.
CSeq: 16340063 UPDATE.
From: <sip:06912345678@sip.telco.de>;tag=00-08135-017e041a-4d21f6037.
Max-Forwards: 31.
Route: <sip:82.115.96.165;lr;ftag=pH663F4S02erm>.
To: "030987654321" <sip:030987654321@82.115.xx.xxx>;tag=pH663F4S02erm.
User-Agent: Cirpack/v4.41e (gw_sip).
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 212.91.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-178C-1923B31.
Content-Length: 300.
.
v=0.
o=cp10 125551618103 125551618105 IN IP4 212.91.xxx.xx.
s=SIP Call.
c=IN IP4 212.91.xxx.xx.
t=0 0.
m=image 6860 udptl t38.
a=sendrecv.
a=T38FaxVersion:0.
a=T38MaxBitRate:9600.
a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF.
a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:1000.
a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:200.
a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy.
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike at jerris.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:42 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request |
|
|
There was just a bunch of work on UPDATE, can you confirm this is the
same behavior with trunk?
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Peter P GMX wrote:
Quote: | Hello,
we have the following problem.
2 Fax machines are communicating via Freeswitch. One is externally
attached via a Telco who is able to handle T.38. The other one is
attached locally.
When 2 Fax machines start syncing each other, the Telco sends a SIP
UPDATE message with T.38 SDP, as it detects fax during the fax
negociations.
Freeswitch answers with an SIP OK message back to the telco, and I can
see the T.38 SDP on the debug console of freeswitch.
Then nothing happens any more until one of fax machines detects
timeout.
We have set proxy-media to true. However is was done during call setup
when both machines communicated with G711 SDP.
The UPDATE message was commited by FS to the telco, but was not sent
to
the other fax, so I think in this case Freeswitch is supposed to
transcode between T.38 and G711 which it cannot do, as we know.
How can I overcome this scenario? Is this a defect, should freeswitch
send the UPDATE message to the other fax? Or is there a workaround?
Best regards
Peter
|
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prometheus001 at gmx.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:47 am Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request |
|
|
Hello Michael
this is a productive system, so I can currently not update to the
current trunk.
But the installed SVN is 14741. Were those changes after 14741? Then
I'll try to find a timeslot at night in order to update freeswitch.
But Freeswitch should forward the UPDATE request in proxy-media mode, right?
Best regards
Peter
Michael Jerris schrieb:
Quote: | There was just a bunch of work on UPDATE, can you confirm this is the
same behavior with trunk?
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Peter P GMX wrote:
Quote: | Hello,
we have the following problem.
2 Fax machines are communicating via Freeswitch. One is externally
attached via a Telco who is able to handle T.38. The other one is
attached locally.
When 2 Fax machines start syncing each other, the Telco sends a SIP
UPDATE message with T.38 SDP, as it detects fax during the fax
negociations.
Freeswitch answers with an SIP OK message back to the telco, and I can
see the T.38 SDP on the debug console of freeswitch.
Then nothing happens any more until one of fax machines detects
timeout.
We have set proxy-media to true. However is was done during call setup
when both machines communicated with G711 SDP.
The UPDATE message was commited by FS to the telco, but was not sent
to
the other fax, so I think in this case Freeswitch is supposed to
transcode between T.38 and G711 which it cannot do, as we know.
How can I overcome this scenario? Is this a defect, should freeswitch
send the UPDATE message to the other fax? Or is there a workaround?
Best regards
Peter
|
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
|
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anthony.minessale at g... Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:08 pm Post subject: [Freeswitch-users] T.38 via UPDATE request |
|
|
I'm sure it won't work because we only implemented forwarding t38 with invite
it would require adding code to say the least.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Peter P GMX <Prometheus001@gmx.net (Prometheus001@gmx.net)> wrote:
Quote: | Hello Michael
this is a productive system, so I can currently not update to the
current trunk.
But the installed SVN is 14741. Were those changes after 14741? Then
I'll try to find a timeslot at night in order to update freeswitch.
But Freeswitch should forward the UPDATE request in proxy-media mode, right?
Best regards
Peter
Michael Jerris schrieb:
Quote: | There was just a bunch of work on UPDATE, can you confirm this is the
same behavior with trunk?
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Peter P GMX wrote:
Quote: | Hello,
we have the following problem.
2 Fax machines are communicating via Freeswitch. One is externally
attached via a Telco who is able to handle T.38. The other one is
attached locally.
When 2 Fax machines start syncing each other, the Telco sends a SIP
UPDATE message with T.38 SDP, as it detects fax during the fax
negociations.
Freeswitch answers with an SIP OK message back to the telco, and I can
see the T.38 SDP on the debug console of freeswitch.
Then nothing happens any more until one of fax machines detects
timeout.
We have set proxy-media to true. However is was done during call setup
when both machines communicated with G711 SDP.
The UPDATE message was commited by FS to the telco, but was not sent
to
the other fax, so I think in this case Freeswitch is supposed to
transcode between T.38 and G711 which it cannot do, as we know.
How can I overcome this scenario? Is this a defect, should freeswitch
send the UPDATE message to the other fax? Or is there a workaround?
Best regards
Peter
|
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org (FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org)
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
|
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org (FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org)
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
|
--
Anthony Minessale II
FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com ([email]MSN%3Aanthony_minessale@hotmail.com[/email])
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com ([email]PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale@gmail.com[/email])
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org ([email]sip%3A888@conference.freeswitch.org[/email])
iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org ([email]googletalk%3Aconf%2B888@conference.freeswitch.org[/email])
pstn:213-799-1400 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|